PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026Diagnostics0 citationsOpen Access

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Use in Cardiac Arrest Patients

View Full Paper
ATAndrew G. TheophanousNANina AngelesDEDenise Elizondo

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of point-of-care ultrasound in diagnosing and managing patients in cardiac arrest.
  • Review of POCUS utility and protocols like SHoC and CASA in cardiac arrest scenarios.
  • Discussion of POCUS findings related to various cardiac conditions.
  • Emphasis on the role of experienced practitioners in performing POCUS.
  • Identified POCUS findings can guide emergency interventions in patients experiencing cardiac arrest.
  • POCUS enhances ability to differentiate between ventricular fibrillation and cardiac standstill.
  • Early identification of reversible causes for cardiac arrest can lead to improved patient outcomes.

Abstract

Over 350,000 patients experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest annually in the United States. Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) in cardiac arrest are critically ill and require emergent clinical decisions and treatment. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is useful as a rapid, bedside diagnostic imaging tool to help elucidate possible causes of cardiac arrest and guide management. Using a validated systematic approach such as the SHoC and CASA protocols, clinicians can safely perform POCUS with shortened pauses during pulse checks. POCUS is key in evaluating cardiac arrhythmias such as ventricular fibrillation (VF), which has higher survival rates with defibrillation, versus cardiac standstill, which has higher mortality per recent research studies. When performed by experienced users, POCUS also facilitates identification of reversible causes for improved cardiac arrest patient outcomes and can guide decisions in resuscitative efforts. In summary, this manuscript is a narrative review that illustrates identifiable POCUS findings and synthesizes them to guide potential emergent intervention in patients in cardiac arrest including: ventricular fibrillation, cardiac standstill, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, right heart strain such as from acute pulmonary embolism, reduced cardiac function, wall motion abnormality, ruptured ventricular pseudoaneurysm, and aortic dissection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Theophanous et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4f92f03e14405aa9aec8https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16101514
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Adult Cardiac Arrest: Clinical Review2024 · 19 citations
  2. 2Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association2023 · 6,114 citations
  3. 3Successful management of a delayed-presented and complicated right ventricular pseudoaneurysm: a case report and literature review2025 · 3 citations
  4. 4Outcome in Cardiac Arrest Patients Found to Have Cardiac Standstill on the Bedside Emergency Department Echocardiogram2001 · 304 citations
  5. 5Percutaneous Closure of Right Ventricular Pseudoaneurysm2015 · 15 citations