PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026British journal of surgery0 citations

Routine pathological nodal status evaluation significantly modifies 2025 ATA risk category of patients with unifocal cN0 cT1b-T2 PTC eligible for thyroid lobectomy: results from a multicentric international study

View Full Paper
ALA LaurinoFPF PennestrìPPP F Procopio

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess how routine evaluation of nodal status affects risk categorization in certain thyroid cancer patients.
  • Analyzed 236 unifocal cN0 cT1b–T2 PTCs scheduled for TL plus I-CND from 6848 thyroidectomies across 4 centers.
  • Compared ATA 2025 risk stratification with and without pathological nodal status.
  • Examined patient characteristics including tumor size and presence of lymph node metastases.
  • Routine nodal status evaluation led to significant risk upgrading; 48 patients were categorized as low risk, 21 as low-intermediate, 155 as intermediate-high, and 12 as high risk (p<0.001).
  • Pathological nodal status evaluation revealed pN1a-status in 52.1% of patients.
  • Incorporating pN-status into risk assessment may reduce recurrence without increasing complications.

Abstract

Abstract Background Occult lymph node metastases (LNMs) occur in up to 50% of cN0 cT1b–T2 papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs) eligible for thyroid lobectomy (TL). Nevertheless the 2025 ATA guidelines discourage routine prophylactic ipsilateral central neck dissection (I-CND). This study assessed the impact of routine I-CND on risk stratification in unifocal cN0 cT1b–T2 PTCs scheduled for TL. Methods Among 6848 thyroidectomies for malignancy performed at 4 referral centers (2014–2025), 236 unifocal cN0 cT1b–T2 PTCs were scheduled for TL plus I-CND. ATA 2025 risk stratification with and without pathological nodal status (pN-status) was compared. Results Mean tumour size was 12.6±4.7 mm. pT-stage were pT1a, pT1b, pT3 and pT4 in 78, 145, 10, 2 and 1 cases, respectively. pN1a-status was found in 123 (52.1%) patients; LNMs2 mm was reported in 74 (31.4%) cases. The mean number of LNMs was 3.3±2.6. Extranodal extension occurred in 12 cases (5.1%; mean metastasis size 4.5±1.6 mm). Multifocality, vascular invasion, aggressive variants and extracapsular invasion were detected in 41.5%, 60.6%, 19.1% and 8.9% cases, respectively. Without pN-status evaluation, 54 (22.9%), 25 (10.6%), and 157 (66.5%) patients would have been classified as low, low-intermediate and intermediate-high risk. Incorporating pN-status resulted in significant risk upgrading: 48 (20.3%) low, 21 (8.9%) low-intermediate, 155 (65.7%) intermediate-high, and 12 (5.1%) high-risk patients (p0.001). Conclusions Routine pN-status evaluation significantly upgrades ATA risk category of cN0 cT1b–T2 PTCs eligible for TL. I-CND should be considered in these patients, as it provides precise staging and may reduce ipsilateral recurrence without increasing complication rate.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Laurino et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5013f03e14405aa9ba80https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag045.037
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper