Why the study?
To estimate major clinical event rates in edoxaban-treated patients with AF and atherosclerotic disease in routine practice, and evaluate their representation in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48.
How do major clinical event rates compare between AF patients with and without atherosclerotic disease treated with edoxaban in routine practice, and how do they compare to trial participants?
Population
13,164 AF patients receiving edoxaban in routine care
Comparison
CAD/PAD vs without CAD/PAD, and vs CAD/PAD patients in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48
Design
Prospective cohort study
Key result
Edoxaban-treated atrial fibrillation patients with concomitant atherosclerotic disease in routine clinical practice had a higher rate of stroke or systemic embolism (HR 1.5) compared to those without atherosclerotic disease.
Authors
Loading...
CAD/PAD was associated with higher stroke/systemic embolism risk on edoxaban; this leaves open whether intensified strategies warrant prospective testing.
Cohort (n=13,164)
Yes
How do major clinical event rates compare between AF patients with and without atherosclerotic disease treated with edoxaban in routine practice, and how do they compare to trial participants?
Effect estimate: HR 1.5 (95% CI 1.14-1.88)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.87% vs 0.59%
AF patients with CAD/PAD treated with edoxaban in routine practice have higher event rates than those without CAD/PAD, but differ significantly in risk profile and mortality patterns from trial populations.
Vries et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation with atherosclerotic disease (n=13,164). Edoxaban vs. Patients without coronary or peripheral artery disease was evaluated on Stroke/systemic embolism (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.14-1.88). Edoxaban-treated atrial fibrillation patients with concomitant atherosclerotic disease in routine clinical practice had a higher rate of stroke or systemic embolism (HR 1.5) compared to those without atherosclerotic disease.