PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine0 citations

C20-09 Respiration-circulation Micromechanics at the Capillary Level Across Lifespan in Mice and Under Positive and Negative Pressure Ventilation

View Full Paper
LCL CastleKRK ReganRLR LeBourdais

Key Points

  • This research aims to quantify how respiration-circulation mechanics change with age and between ventilation types in mouse lungs.
  • C57BL/6 mice categorized by age: postnatal (<7 days), young (12-18 weeks), aged (20+ months).
  • Lungs imaged using crystal ribcage and 3D confocal microscopy with Evans Blue dye for vascular labeling.
  • Mathematical modeling computed Young's modulus for capillaries and alveoli.
  • Postnatal vessels display lower distention compared to older vessels under pressure changes.
  • Mathematical modeling shows postnatal lungs are significantly stiffer than aged lungs.
  • Capillaries constricted more under positive pressure compared to negative pressure, particularly notable at 9 cmH2O.

Abstract

Abstract Rationale The mechanical, biological, and immunological properties of the lung undergo progressive remodeling throughout the lifespan and in positive- vs negative-pressure ventilation. Although histology provides static snapshots of structural changes, quantifying age-related changes in the lung’s dynamic response to mechanical stimuli, particularly in a functioning lung, remains elusive. Capillary and alveolar distention – how the diameter of capillaries and alveoli change in response to pressure – are two such dynamic processes. To overcome these limitations, we utilize the crystal ribcage (Nature Methods, 2023) to image functional mouse lungs at a range of biologically relevant vascular and transpulmonary pressures. We directly quantify capillary and alveolar distention as the pulmonary pressure conditions are precisely adjusted, combining these experimental findings with mathematical modeling to estimate the axial and radial Young’s moduli of the intact capillaries. Additionally, we probe the effect of positive (mechanical ventilation) versus negative (spontaneous breathing) pressure ventilation at the capillary scale. Together, this data offers a valuable measure of age-related and ventilation mode-dependent mechanical changes in respiration-circulation coupling, with direct impact on trafficking and activities of circulating cells. Methods C57BL/6 mice are categorized by age as postnatal (7 days), young (12-18 weeks), and aged (20+ months). Lungs are resected and imaged using a crystal ribcage (Fig. 1A). Evans Blue dye is perfused to label the vascular lumen (Fig. 1B). 3D image stacks are acquired at each pressure via fluorescent confocal microscopy, and alveolar and septal diameters are quantified using custom-written Python scripts. Mathematical modeling calculates the axial and radial Young’s modulus components of the vessels. Results Postnatal vessels distend less than those in older counterparts in response to changes in vascular and transpulmonary pressures (Fig. 1C). Subsequent mathematical modeling quantifies the radial and axial Young’s moduli for vessels, with postnatal lungs significantly stiffer than aged counterparts (Fig. 1D). Alveoli responded similarly to both positive- and negative-pressure ventilation (Fig. 1E(i)). However, we find that increased positive transpulmonary pressure constricted capillaries more so than did negative-pressure increases (Fig. 1E(ii)), with notable reductions across the 9 cmH2O pressure regime. Conclusions Using the crystal ribcage, we capture how the micromechanical response to alveolar and vascular pressures varies across the murine lifespan at the capillary and alveolar scale. We find lung micromechanics vary with age and postnatal capillaries and septa are stiffest radially and axially. Capillary lumens are less responsive under negative pressure compared to positive pressure, potentially implying heightened compression under positive pressure. This abstract is funded by: DP2HL168562, Beckman Young Investigator Award, NSF CAREER Award, Hevolution/AFAR New Investigator Award

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Castle et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5064f03e14405aa9c202https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.5414
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper