PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Industry Analysis of Bottled Water and Carbonated Soft Drinks in Oman: Market Structure, Excise Tax Incidence, and Price Elasticity

View Full Paper
AAAtheer AlSabqiAAAsayil Alhajri

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the bottled water and carbonated soft drinks markets in Oman, focusing on market structure, tax effects, and price elasticity.
  • Applied market structure classification and Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) analysis.
  • Estimated arc elasticity and conducted welfare analysis.
  • Evaluated the impact of selective excise tax introduced in June 2019.
  • CSD market classified as a duopoly with an HHI of nearly 10,000, while bottled water is under monopolistic competition.
  • Tax-only arc elasticity for CSDs is approximately -0.23, and compound-shock elasticity is around -0.92.
  • Consumers bear about 63% of the excise tax burden.

Abstract

This paper analyses the bottled water and carbonated soft drinks (CSD) markets in Oman using five microeconomic tools: market structure classification, Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) concentration analysis, supply and demand shift analysis, arc elasticity estimation, and welfare analysis. The bottled water market is classified as monopolistic competition, while the CSD market operates as a highly concentrated duopoly dominated by Oman Refreshment Company SAOG and Dhofar Beverage and Foodstuff Company SAOG, with an HHI approaching 10,000. Oman’s selective excise tax, introduced in June 2019 at 50% on CSDs while exempting natural still water, generated an upward supply shift for CSD producers. Two distinct elasticity estimates are reported: a tax-only arc elasticity of approximately −0.23 (2018–2019) and a compound-shock elasticity of approximately −0.92 (9M-2023 versus 9M-2024), reflecting the combined effects of the tax, health-consciousness trends, and the October 2023 regional boycott of Western franchise brands. Tax incidence analysis indicates consumers bear approximately 63% of the excise burden. Three policy recommendations are proposed: a tiered excise tax structure differentiated by sugar content, a domestic beverage brand development programme, and mandatory quarterly price transparency reporting for CSD producers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

AlSabqi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d50aef03e14405aa9c9e7https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20264245
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper