PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026Infectious Diseases of Poverty0 citationsOpen Access

A county-level indicator framework for assessing schistosomiasis transmission risk in post-transmission-interruption China

AXAndong XuHZHong ZhuJXJing Xu

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop an indicator framework to assess schistosomiasis transmission risk post-transmission interruption in China.
  • Developed a county-level indicator framework through a two-round Delphi consultation and entropy weight method.
  • Calculated an annual composite risk index (R) using longitudinal data from six pilot counties between 2020 and 2024.
  • Evaluated robustness by analyzing county-year rankings under different subjective preference coefficients using Spearman's correlation.
  • The framework includes three first-level, twelve second-level, and thirty-nine third-level indicators in biological, environmental, and social domains.
  • Composite risk index (R) varied from 0.18 to 0.44 with low overall risk observed.
  • Risk rankings showed high consistency across varying preference coefficients (ρ = 0.909–0.998), indicating robust assessment.

Abstract

Abstract Background In China’s post-transmission-interruption stage of schistosomiasis control, infection signals are often sparse, and conventional surveillance indicators focused on infection detection may not adequately capture residual risk across heterogeneous ecological settings. This study aimed to develop an operational indicator framework for assessing schistosomiasis transmission risk and supporting routine risk assessment and management in this stage. Methods A county-level indicator framework for schistosomiasis transmission risk assessment was developed through a two-round Delphi consultation and weighted using a combined Delphi-entropy weight method. Using longitudinal data from six pilot counties during 2020–2024, an annual composite risk index ( R ) was calculated by weighted linear aggregation and classified into risk levels with trapezoidal fuzzy membership functions. Robustness was evaluated by perturbing the subjective preference coefficient (α) and examining the consistency of county-year rankings across scenarios using Spearman’s rank correlation. Results The final framework comprised three first-level, twelve second-level, and thirty-nine third-level indicators spanning biological, environmental, and social domains. Across the six pilot counties, R ranged from 0.18 to 0.44 and the overall risk level was predominantly low. Nonetheless, distinct county-level risk profiles were observed between lake/marshland and mountainous settings. Risk rankings remained highly consistent under α perturbations ( ρ = 0.909–0.998), indicating good robustness of the assessment results. Conclusions This framework translates multidimensional determinants relevant to the re-establishment of schistosomiasis transmission into interpretable county-level risk profiles. It provides an operational tool to support targeted surveillance and more efficient allocation of control resources in low-endemicity contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5100f03e14405aa9d341https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-026-01453-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper