PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine0 citations

A31-04 Associations of Frequency of Cannabis Use With Receipt of Lung Cancer Screening and Immunizations

View Full Paper
ASA SajjadianSKS KeyhaniARA S Rustagi

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the relationship between cannabis use frequency and adherence to preventive health interventions such as lung cancer screening and vaccinations.
  • Analyzed 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data with a sample size of 93,735 adults.
  • Participants reported cannabis use frequency, used logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR).
  • Considered various demographics including race/ethnicity, education, income, marital status, insurance, and employment.
  • Daily cannabis use linked to lower odds of receiving lung cancer screening (LCS aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.37-0.73).
  • Influenza vaccination odds also decreased with daily use (aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.50-0.63).
  • Pneumococcal vaccination rates decreased (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.86) as cannabis use frequency increased.

Abstract

Abstract Rationale Cannabis use is increasingly common in the U.S., and prior studies have suggested a link between cannabis and elevated all-cause mortality. The relationship between cannabis use and preventive health interventions that may reduce mortality is unclear. There is some data to suggest that cannabis use is associated with acute reductions in motivation which may influence receipt of preventive services. We examined the frequency of cannabis use and adherence to guideline-recommended screening and vaccination. Methods We analyzed 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, which included LCS in the core national telephone survey. Exposure, assessed among respondents from states fielding the cannabis module, was days of cannabis use in the past 30 days, modeled as continuous dose-response (per 30 days). For example, a respondent who used cannabis daily over the prior 30 days would be coded as having an exposure of 30/30=1; a respondent who used cannabis 15 of the prior 30 days would be coded as having an exposure of 15/30 = 0.5. Outcomes, among respondents eligible under national recommendations, were receipt of LCS, influenza vaccination, or pneumococcal vaccination. Survey-weighted logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for receipt of each intervention adjusted for race/ethnicity, education, income, marital status, insurance, and employment, accounting for BRFSS complex design. Results The analytic sample included n = 93,735 adults; n = 11,525 reported cannabis use within the past 30 days. Respondents were 48.3% (95% CI 47.7-48.9%) women, 33.1% (95% CI 32.5-33.7%) non-Hispanic White, and had a median age of 50 years (95% CI 50-51). In dose-response models, daily cannabis use was linked to lower odds of respiratory preventive care compared to no cannabis use: LCS 0.52 0.37-0.73, influenza vaccination 0.56 0.50-0.63, and pneumococcal vaccination 0.72 0.61-0.86 per 30 days. Conclusions Cannabis use was associated with lower adherence to pulmonary preventive care, with dose-response declines across LCS, influenza vaccination, and pneumococcal vaccination. While causality cannot be inferred from cross-sectional data, these findings suggest that more frequent cannabis use may be tied to lower use of preventive health interventions that are core components of comprehensive pulmonary care. If corroborated, this association may contribute to observed links between cannabis use and higher mortality. Longitudinal studies should clarify mechanisms such as access barriers, risk perception, or competing health priorities. Findings highlight opportunities to integrate substance-use assessment into pulmonary screening and vaccination outreach. This abstract is funded by: This work was supported in part by Career Development Award Number CX002713 from the United States (U.S.) Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Science Research and Development Service (Dr. Rustagi). Dr. Rustagi also received support from the National Institute on Aging (1R03AG082924), VA’s Lung Precision Oncology Program, and VA’s VISN21 Early Career Award Program. The study sponsors had no role in the study design; collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; writing the report; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and not their employers, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the U.S. government, or the study sponsors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sajjadian et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5100f03e14405aa9d43ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.3620
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A100-03 Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration, 2015-20252026
  2. 2Abstract B014: Cannabis use among cancer survivors and its association with cardiometabolic risk factors: Findings from the All of Us Research Program2024
  3. 3A31-03 Association of Agent Orange Exposure and Lung Cancer Screening in a National Cohort of Veterans2026
  4. 4D22-08 Factors Associated With Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening Among High-Risk Individuals in the United Kingdom Using Electronic Health Records2026
  5. 5Association of Cannabis Use With Cardiovascular Outcomes Among US Adults2024 · 181 citations