PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026BJUI Compass0 citationsOpen Access

Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage II seminoma: Comparative analysis against established paradigms using the National Cancer Data Base

JLJosiah K. LowJMJohn E. Musser

Key Points

  • This research analyzes outcomes following primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage II seminoma, comparing it to standard treatment options.
  • Utilized the National Cancer Data Base to identify patients with clinical stage II germ cell tumours from 2004 to 2022.
  • Conducted Cox regression for survival analysis, focusing on overall survival for CSII seminoma and salvage-chemotherapy-free survival.
  • Included 4661 patients in the primary analysis with a median follow-up of 6.8 years.
  • Overall survival did not significantly differ between primary treatment with pRPLND and chemotherapy (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.93–1.93, p=0.12) or radiation (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.65–1.59, p=0.95).
  • Two-year salvage chemotherapy-free survival rates were 70% for cN1, 45% for cN2, and 36% for cN3, indicating that increasing clinical disease extent elevates the risk of requiring salvage chemotherapy.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This paper aims to perform a comparative, real‐world analysis of outcomes after primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pRPLND) for clinical stage II (CSII) seminoma. Patients and Methods Using the National Cancer Data Base, we identified patients with CSII germ cell tumours (GCT) between 2004 and 2022. Cox regression was used for survival analyses. Primary analysis examined overall survival (OS) for patients with CSII seminoma. A sensitivity analysis after energy‐balancing weighting was performed. Secondary analysis examined salvage‐chemotherapy‐free survival (SFS) after pRPLND for CSII seminoma. Results Primary analysis included 4661 patients (median follow‐up 6.8 years, IQR 3.6–10.5 years). OS did not differ by primary treatment (vs. chemotherapy—HR1.34, 95% CI 0.93–1.93, p = 0.12; versus radiation—1.02, 0.65–1.59, p = 0.95). Sensitivity analysis results were similar. Secondary analysis demonstrated estimated 2‐year salvage chemotherapy‐free survival rates of 70%, 45% and 36% for cN1, cN2 and cN3, respectively. Unaccounted bias should be considered given the retrospective nature of the underlying data. Conclusion OS after pRPLND for CSII seminoma appears comparable to alternatives. Risk of receiving salvage chemotherapy increases with clinical disease extent.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Low et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5100f03e14405aa9d441https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70229
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Oncological outcomes of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with clinical stage IIB seminoma: A binational retrospective analysis.2026
  2. 2Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage IIA/B metastatic seminoma: A multi-centre Australian experience.2026
  3. 3Surgery in stage IIA/IIB seminoma: A “Living systematic review” and meta-analysis of prospective studies2026
  4. 4Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for patients with metastatic pure seminoma.2026
  5. 5Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic non‐seminomatous germ cell tumours: outcomes and adjuvant chemotherapy2024 · 7 citations