PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Analysis of AI Coding Assistants for Software Development

View Full Paper
KCKrish Chaudhary

Key Points

  • To evaluate the performance of various AI coding assistants in software development tasks.
  • Comparative analysis of ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, Gemini Advanced, and Claude.
  • Assessment based on code accuracy, explanation quality, response speed, security awareness, and usability.
  • Performed evaluations across different programming tasks including debugging and front-end development.
  • Identified strengths and limitations of each AI coding assistant.
  • Highlighted differences in performance for code generation and debugging tasks.
  • Found varying levels of security awareness across tools.

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of AI coding assistants including ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, Gemini Advanced, and Claude. The study evaluates the tools using programming tasks related to code generation, debugging, security, front-end development, and software engineering workflows. The evaluation compares performance based on code accuracy, explanation quality, response speed, security awareness, and usability. The findings highlight the strengths and limitations of modern AI coding assistants across different software development scenarios.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krish Chaudhary (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5122f03e14405aa9d7cdhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20271822
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper