PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2005AIP conference proceedings5 citations

How Do You Hit A Moving Target? Addressing The Dynamics Of Students’ Thinking

View Full Paper
DMDavid E. Meltzer

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

From the standpoint both of research and instruction, the variable and dynamic nature of students' thought processes poses a significant challenge to PER. It is difficult merely to assess and characterize the diverse phases of students' thinking as they gain and express understanding of a concept. (We might call this the "kinematics" of students' thought processes.) Much harder still is uncovering the various factors (instructional method, student characteristics, etc.) that influence and determine the trajectory of students' thinking. (We could call this the "dynamics" of students' thinking.) The task of deciphering the mutual interaction of these factors adds to the challenge. I will outline some of the initial work that has been done along these lines by various researchers, and I will identify some directions for future research that I think might be fruitful for workers in PER.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

David E. Meltzer (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d6a8288250cfcc2a4ed2dhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.2084688
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Teaching Experiment — What it is and what it isn’t2004 · 58 citations
  2. 2Why Teach Kinematics2002 · 1 citations
  3. 3Practitioner's Guide to Dynamic Assessment1991 · 410 citations
  4. 4Conceptual dynamics: Following changing student views of force and motion1997 · 66 citations
  5. 5Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools1990 · 421 citations