PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1917The Yale Law Journal1,445 citations

Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning

View Full Paper
WHWesley Newcomb Hohfeld

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The present discussion, while intended to be intrinsically completeso far as intelligent and convenient perusal is concerned,represents, as originally planned, a continuation of an articlewhich appeared under the same title more than three years ago.It therefore seems desirable to indicate, in very general form,the scope and purpose of the latter. The main divisions wereentitled: Legal Conceptions Contrasted with Non-legal Conceptions;Operative Facts Contrasted with Evidential Facts; andFundamental Jural Relations Contrasted with One Another. Thejural relations analyzed and discussed under the last subtitle were,at the outset, grouped in a convenient "scheme of opposites andcorrelatives"; and it will greatly facilitate the presentation ofthe matters to be hereafter considered if that scheme be reproducedat the present point:

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld (1917) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0da77f1e1a6dfdb4bab764https://doi.org/10.2307/786270
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper