PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 20, 2013Choice Reviews Online881 citations

To save everything, click here: the folly of technological solutionism

View Full Paper

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how technology's simplification of complex societal issues may alter moral and ethical behavior.
  • Analysis of the implications of smart technologies and big data in societal contexts.
  • Discussion of historical and contemporary examples of technological solutionism.
  • Examination of the moral consequences of reinterpreting political dilemmas as mere efficiency problems.
  • Highlights the potential dangers of treating complex issues like crime and pollution solely as data-driven problems.
  • Argues for the necessity of maintaining the imperfections of liberal democracy in the face of technological solutions.
  • Calls for a new post-Internet approach to debating the implications of digital interventions.

Abstract

A New York Times Notable Book of the Year In the very near future, smart technologies and big data will allow us to make large-scale and sophisticated interventions in politics, culture, and everyday life. Technology will allow us to solve problems in highly original ways and create new incentives to get more people to do the right thing. But how will such affect our society, once deeply political, moral, and irresolvable dilemmas are recast as uncontroversial and easily manageable matters of technological efficiency? What if some such problems are simply vices in disguise? What if some friction in communication is productive and some hypocrisy in politics necessary? The temptation of the digital age is to fix everything--from crime to corruption to pollution to obesity--by digitally quantifying, tracking, or gamifying behavior. But when we change the motivations for our moral, ethical, and civic behavior we may also change the very nature of that behavior. Technology, Evgeny Morozov proposes, can be a force for improvement--but only if we keep solutionism in check and learn to appreciate the imperfections of liberal democracy. Some of those imperfections are not accidental but by design. Arguing that we badly need a new, post-Internet way to debate the moral consequences of digital technologies, To Save Everything, Click Here warns against a world of seamless efficiency, where everyone is forced to wear Silicon Valley's digital straitjacket.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 2013 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0dbb3a88250cfcc2a51ecahttps://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-0324
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper