PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1977Law & Society Review221 citations

Commodity Form and Legal Form: An Essay on the “Relative Autonomy” of the Law

View Full Paper
IBIsaac D. Balbus

Key Points

  • Examine the structural relationship between the commodity form and the legal form to refine theoretical understandings of the relative autonomy of the law.
  • Conducted a conceptual and theoretical autocritique evaluating earlier dialectical analyses of legal repression.
  • Engaged critically with competing frameworks in contemporary legal sociology, specifically critical social thought about law.
  • Provides a refined structural analysis illustrating how the logic of commodity exchange relates to the formal independence of legal systems.
  • Identifies theoretical shortcomings in earlier models of legal repression while challenging alternative formulations of critical jurisprudence.

Abstract

After a good deal of thought I have decided not to respond directly to Professor Trubek's exhaustive review of The Dialectics of Legal Repression , but will rather leave it to readers of my book to determine for themselves the adequacy of his description, analysis, and evaluation of the material contained therein. However, insofar as Professor Trubek also refers briefly in his essay to my “more recent,” and until now unpublished, work, it seems appropriate to present a sample of this work, especially since Trubek himself argues that it entails a “major refinement” which “allows Balbus to explain what remains unexplained in The Dialectics.” Indeed, in certain respects the following essay constitutes an autocritique of the theoretical analysis in my book, and a comparison of the two will thus permit the reader to assess indirectly the extent of my agreement with Trubek's critique. At the same time, what follows also constitutes an implicit and, at times explicit, critique of Trubek's own effort to elaborate and apply an alternative to my position, the effort he calls “critical social thought about law.”

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Isaac D. Balbus (1977) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0dc2b6fb8c7be8ffba8028https://doi.org/10.2307/3053132
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper