PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1993Language in Society303 citations

Common and uncommon ground: Social and structural factors in codeswitching

View Full Paper
CMCarol Myers‐Scotton

Key Points

  • This research aims to differentiate social forces from structural factors influencing codeswitching.
  • Developed a model of intrasentential codeswitching to test its validity against community practices.
  • Analyzed social motivations influencing codeswitching at macro and micro levels across various communities.
  • The model accounts for all observed patterns in codeswitching across different communities.
  • Community-specific social forces play a crucial role in determining preferred codeswitching patterns.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The social forces affecting the performance of codeswitching (CS) may be distinguished from those factors controlling its basic structure, with which they interact. The constraints on possible patterns in CS are largely under innately based controls. These constraints are presented here in a model of intrasentential CS, and their validity is tested against findings of CS practices in a number of communities; all options can be accounted for under the model. Thus the options for CS structures seem universally set; but community-specific or group-specific social forces may determine which permissible patterns are preferred . In addition, micro-level, discourse-based factors may prompt individuals to produce certain CS structures. A second model of the social motivations for CS helps explain both the macro- and micro-level preferences. (Bilingualism, codeswitching, language contact, socio-pragmatics)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carol Myers‐Scotton (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0de49e48a82a5ce309e0afhttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500017449
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparing codeswitching and borrowing1992 · 334 citations
  2. 2Logic and Conversation1975 · 20,603 citations
  3. 3Linguistic consequences of language contact and restriction: The case of French in Ontario, Canada. By Raymond Mougeon and Edouard Beniak. (Oxford studies in language contact.) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. Pp. 247. Cloth $69.00.1992 · 234 citations
  4. 4Intrasentential code switching and pronouns: on the categorial status of functional elements1994 · 193 citations
  5. 5Natural Language Parsing1985 · 460 citations