PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1977British Journal of Sociology2,375 citations

Knowledge and Social Imagery

View Full Paper
JCJames G. CarrierDBDavid Bloor

Key Points

  • Examine the impact of Bloor's strong programme on the philosophy and history of science debates.
  • Analysis of Bloor's arguments and their reception in academic circles
  • Responses to critiques of the strong programme
  • Historical context provided in the Afterword
  • Bloor's strong programme remains a significant framework for understanding science.
  • His work has influenced subsequent discussions in philosophy and sociology of science.
  • Critiques and support indicate ongoing relevance of Bloor's contributions.

Abstract

The first edition of this book profoundly challenged and divided students of philosophy, sociology, and the history of science when it was published in 1976. In this second edition, Bloor responds in a substantial new Afterword to the heated debates engendered by his book.Bloor's book came out as a broadside that announced a new approach to the history and philosophy of science, an approach that became known as the strong programme.' . . . Now, any book published in history and philosophy of science must take Bloor and the strong programme into account.--Robert J. Richards, University of Chicago

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carrier et al. (1977) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e071d8ee49c7ff110d8e3https://doi.org/10.2307/590007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper