PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 7, 2023Journal of AI81 citationsOpen Access

Google Bard Generated Literature Review: Metaverse

ÖAÖmer Aydın

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the effectiveness of using Google Bard to generate literature reviews in the field of Metaverse.
  • Utilized Google Bard to generate texts based on questions about Metaverse-related topics.
  • Collected 10 recent articles on Metaverse from Google Scholar for analysis.
  • Checked generated texts for plagiarism using ithenticate and evaluated semantically.
  • Plagiarism matching rate of paraphrased texts was higher than original answers from Bard.
  • Google Bard produced usable summaries, but with notable plagiarism concerns.
  • Comparison with OpenAI ChatGPT highlighted differences in text generation capabilities.

Abstract

Literature review articles aim to present studies in a field to researchers in a regular, systematic and meaningful way. It is often a very difficult process to reach all the studies in the field to be reviewed or to identify and evaluate the important ones. With this study, the use of Artificial Intelligence robots and moreover generative artificial intelligence in literature review processes is evaluated. Google Bard was used to detect artificial intelligence's ability to generate a literature review article. First, Bard was asked questions to write about some of the Metaverse-related topics in this article. Some of the texts in the study were generated entirely by the answers given to the questions asked by Bard. In addition, 10 articles on Metaverse published in the last three years (2021, 2022 and 2023) were collected by searching Google Scholar with the word "Metaverse". Afterwards, these studies were interpreted by Bard. Bard was told to paraphrase the summary parts of the related studies and the produced texts were shared in the study. All produced texts were checked through ithenticate and the results were evaluated. In addition, the texts were evaluated semantically. Additionally, a comparison with the capabilities of OpenAI ChatGPT is given. The results are promising; However, it was observed that the plagiarism matching rate of the paraphrased texts was higher when compared to the answers given to the questions. This article is an experiment to show that the collection and expression of knowledge can be accelerated with the help of artificial intelligence. It is considered that the relevant tools will be used more and more effectively in academic literature in the future.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ömer Aydın (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e15ce7a57fdc4e227a2d4https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1311271
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper