PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1995Circulation209 citations

Reduced Contraction and Altered Frequency Response of Isolated Ventricular Myocytes From Patients With Heart Failure

View Full Paper
CDCrispin H. DaviesKDKerry DaviaJBJ. G. Bennett

Key Result

Isolated ventricular myocytes from failing human hearts exhibited reduced contraction amplitude at 1.4 Hz stimulation (3.9% vs 8.8%; P<0.001) compared to nonfailing control hearts.

Structured PICO

Does severe heart failure alter the contraction amplitude and frequency response of isolated human ventricular myocytes compared to nonfailing controls?

P
Population
Left ventricular myocytes isolated from the hearts of patients with severe heart failure undergoing heart transplantation, and control myocytes from myocardial biopsies from patients with coronary disease but preserved left ventricular systolic function or from rejected donor hearts.
I
Intervention
Exposure to increasing stimulation frequencies (0.2 Hz to 1.4 Hz) and varying calcium/temperature conditions (maximally activating extracellular calcium at 37 degrees C or 2 mmol/L calcium at 32 degrees C).
C
Comparator
Myocytes from nonfailing control hearts exposed to the same stimulation frequencies and conditions.
O
Outcome
Contraction amplitude and frequency response.surrogate

Isolated ventricular myocytes from failing human hearts exhibit reduced contraction, slowed relaxation, and impaired frequency response compared to nonfailing hearts, demonstrating that cellular-level dysfunction contributes to clinical heart failure.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 3.9% vs 8.8%

p-value: p=<.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous work has failed to demonstrate reduced maximal contraction of isolated ventricular myocytes from failing human hearts compared with nonfailing control hearts. The effect of alterations in stimulation frequency and temperature on the contraction of isolated ventricular myocytes has been investigated. Left ventricular myocytes were isolated from the hearts of patients with severe heart failure undergoing heart transplantation and compared with myocytes isolated from myocardial biopsies from patients with coronary disease but preserved left ventricular systolic function or from myocytes from rejected donor hearts. METHODS AND RESULTS: Myocytes were exposed to either a maximally activating level of extracellular calcium at 37 degrees C or to 2 mmol/L calcium at 32 degrees C. There was no significant difference in the contraction amplitude between myocytes from failing and nonfailing hearts at 0.2 Hz. With increasing stimulation frequency, there was a reduction in contraction amplitude in cells from failing hearts relative to control hearts in both maximal calcium from 0.33 Hz (4.5% versus 6.6%) to 1.4 Hz (3.9% versus 8.8%) (ANCOVA, P < .001) and at 2 mmol/L calcium from 0.50 Hz (2.3% versus 3.5%) to 1.4 Hz (1.8% versus 3.9%) (ANCOVA, P < .001). The time to peak contraction and the times to 50% and 90% relaxation were prolonged in myocytes from failing hearts at stimulation rate of 0.2 Hz (P < .01), but only the time to 50% relaxation was prolonged at 1.0 Hz (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced contraction, slowed relaxation, and impaired frequency response occurring at the level of the individual ventricular myocyte can be demonstrated in human heart failure. This demonstrates that disruption of myocyte function can contribute to both the systolic and the diastolic abnormalities that occur in the failing human heart.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Davies et al. (1995) studied severe heart failure. Increasing stimulation frequency vs. Myocytes from nonfailing hearts was evaluated on Contraction amplitude at 1.4 Hz in maximal calcium (p=<.001). Isolated ventricular myocytes from failing human hearts exhibited reduced contraction amplitude at 1.4 Hz stimulation (3.9% vs 8.8%; P<0.001) compared to nonfailing control hearts.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e8fe2a0467873efc842e7https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.9.2540
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper