PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 24, 2016American Journal of Epidemiology53 citationsOpen Access

Prostate Cancer and Socioeconomic Status in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer

View Full Paper
TKTuomas P. KilpeläinenKTKirsi TalalaJRJani Raitanen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PC) screening remains controversial. We investigated whether screening reduces the difference in prostate cancer risk by socioeconomic status (SES). In 1996-2011, a total of 72,139 men from the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer were analyzed. Outcome measures were PC incidence, mortality, and participation in screening. SES indicators were educational level, income, and home ownership status (data obtained from the Statistics Finland registry). The mean duration of follow-up was 12.7 years. Higher SES was associated with a higher incidence of low- to moderate-risk PC but with a lower risk of advanced PC. Higher education was associated with significantly lower PC mortality in both control and screening arms (risk ratio = 0.48-0.69; P < 0.05). Higher income was also associated with lower PC mortality but only in the control arm (risk ratio = 0.45-0.73; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in SES gradient by arm (Pinteraction = 0.33 and Pinteraction = 0.47 for primary vs. secondary education and primary vs. tertiary education, respectively; Pinteraction = 0.65 and Pinteraction = 0.09 for low vs. intermediate income and low vs. high income, respectively; and Pinteraction = 0.27 among home ownership status strata). Substantial gradients by SES in PC incidence and mortality were observed in the control arm. Higher SES was associated with overdiagnosis of low-risk PC and, conversely, lower risk of incurable PC and lower PC mortality. Special attention should be directed toward recruiting men with low SES to participate in population-based cancer screening.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kilpeläinen et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e9b2e7b06478e784c5e49https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww084
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prostate cancer incidence and survival in relation to education (United States)2004 · 59 citations
  2. 2Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease.1968 · 3,082 citations
  3. 3Home ownership and mortality: a register-based follow-up study of 300 000 Finns2008 · 51 citations
  4. 4Trends in Treatment Costs for Localized Prostate Cancer2007 · 44 citations
  5. 5Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health in 22 European Countries2008 · 3,362 citations