PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 21, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Data, Dialogue, and Discovery: A Controlled Workflow for AI-Supported Historical Research and Analysis

View Full Paper
KGKaspar Gubler

Key Points

  • The aim is to present a controlled workflow that integrates AI methods into historical research for enhanced data analysis and discovery.
  • Developed within the REPAC project at the University of Bern
  • Utilized nodegoat for connecting prosopographical data on European academics from 1250 to 1550
  • Implemented two workflows: one for source processing and data enrichment, and another using a retrieval-augmented generation pipeline.
  • The first workflow enhances data with historical text translation and named entity recognition.
  • The second workflow improves contextual grounding for dialogic analysis using large language models.
  • The evaluation suggests AI's potential in facilitating discovery while raising concerns over depth in subject engagement.

Abstract

This poster presents a controlled workflow for AI-supported historical research developed in the context of the Repertorium Academicum (REPAC) project at the Historical Institute, University of Bern. Using nodegoat as a research environment, the workflow connects structured prosopographical data on European academics between 1250 and 1550 with AI-supported methods for information retrieval, data enrichment, and analysis. Two complementary workflows are highlighted. The first focuses on source processing and data enrichment, including translation of historical texts, named entity recognition, text tagging, and structured extraction into nodegoat. The second combines curated REPAC data with large language models through a retrieval-augmented generation pipeline: relevant data are retrieved first and then supplied as contextual grounding for dialogic analysis. The poster argues that AI can support discovery in historical research when embedded in transparent, data-driven environments. At the same time, it reflects critically on possible effects of accelerated AI-assisted workflows, including reduced depth of subject engagement and fewer serendipitous discoveries. The central principle is: retrieve first, interpret second.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaspar Gubler (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ea127be05d6e3efb5f836https://doi.org/10.48620/97388
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper