PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 21, 2026Minerals0 citationsOpen Access

Partial Ordering of Cations by the Wolframite Mechanism Using Fe2+- and Sc-Dominant Minerals of the Columbite Supergroup as Examples

View Full Paper
NCNikita V. ChukanovNZN. V. ZubkovaAKAnatoly V. Kasatkin

Key Points

  • The aim is to study the partial ordering of cations in columbite-supergroup minerals and propose a method to quantify it.
  • Electron microprobe analyses and powder/single-crystal X-ray diffraction were employed.
  • Crystal structure refinement was conducted using ixiolite-type and wolframine-type models.
  • Samples were analyzed from two locations: Sakhanaiskiy granite massif and Heftetjern pegmatite.
  • Cation ordering was found to be 91% for Sample 1 and 26% for Sample 2.
  • Transition from wolframite to ixiolite model improved the R-factor for Sample 1 from 0.0365 to 0.0764.
  • Significant cation disordering was observed despite high ordering in some cases.

Abstract

In most cases, columbite-supergroup minerals are characterized by partial ordering of cations, which makes their identification based only on chemical composition and powder diffraction data difficult. Columbite-supergroup minerals with partially ordered cations were studied by means of electron microprobe analyses, powder and single-crystal X-ray diffraction, including crystal structure refinement in ixiolite-type and wolframine-type models. The samples originate from the Sakhanaiskiy granite massif, Eastern Siberia, Russia, (Sample 1) and from the Heftetjern pegmatite, Telemark, Norway (Sample 2). Their representative empirical formulae are (Fe2+0.81Mn2+0.53)Σ1.34Fe3+0.07(Ti0.23Zr0.11Sn0.02)Σ0.36(Nb1.45Ta0.26)Σ1.71W0.52O8 (Sample 1) and (Mn2+0.28Fe2+0.25)Σ0.53Sc1.08(Sn0.32Ti0.04)Σ0.36(Ta1.41Nb0.52)Σ1.93W0.10O8 (Sample 2). Based on these data and the results of the crystal structure refinement, the studied samples can be considered as columbite-supergroup minerals in which cations are partially ordered in accordance with the wolframite mechanism. An approach is suggested according to which the degree of cation ordering in such columbite-supergroup minerals can be estimated based on the electron contents refined for different sites in a monoclinic model. According to this criterion, the degree of cation ordering of Samples 1 and 2 is 91% and 26%, respectively. Despite a significant degree of cation disordering, transition from the wolframite to ixiolite model results in a significant enhancement of the R-factor of the structure refinement (from 0.0365 to 0.0764 and from 0.0207 to 0.0610, respectively).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chukanov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ea127be05d6e3efb5f8f8https://doi.org/10.3390/min16050536
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nioboixiolite-(Fe 3+ ), (Nb 0.5 Fe 3+ 0.5 )O 2 , a new ixiolite-group mineral from the Eifel palaeovolcanic region, Germany2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Compositional and structural systematics of the columbite group1995 · 79 citations
  3. 3Crystal chemistry and structure of the orthorhombic (Fe,Mn)(Ta,Nb)2O6 family of compounds2001 · 24 citations
  4. 4Quantitative Data File for Ore Minerals1993 · 129 citations
  5. 5Heftetjernite, a new scandium mineral from the Heftetjern pegmatite, Tordal, Norway2010 · 24 citations