PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 10, 2003Archives of Internal Medicine110 citations

Validity of the JNC VI Recommendations for the Management of Hypertension in a General Population of Japanese Elderly

View Full Paper
HAHisatomi ArimaYTYumihiro TanizakiYKYutaka Kiyohara

Key Result

Stage 3 hypertension significantly increased the risk of cardiovascular disease compared with optimal blood pressure in Japanese elderly subjects (HR 5.34; 95% CI 2.66-10.71; P<.001).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=588)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does elevated blood pressure increase the incidence of cardiovascular disease in the Japanese elderly population?

P
Population
588 cardiovascular disease-free residents of a Japanese community aged 60 years or older. Treated hypertensive patients were excluded.
C
Comparator
Optimal and normal blood pressure
O
Outcome
Incidence of cardiovascular diseasehard clinical

The JNC VI recommendations for hypertension management are applicable to Japanese elderly subjects aged 79 years or younger, but hypertension may not be a significant risk factor for CVD in those aged 80 years or older.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 5.34 (95% CI 2.66-10.71)

p-value: p=<.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether the treatment recommendations presented in the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure are applicable to the Japanese elderly population. METHODS: We followed up 588 cardiovascular disease-free residents of a Japanese community who were 60 years or older from November 1, 1961, through October 31, 1993. Treated hypertensive patients were excluded from the analysis. During this period, CVD occurred in 179 subjects. The incidences were estimated by the pooling of repeated observations method. RESULTS: The age- and sex-adjusted incidences of cardiovascular disease significantly increased with elevated blood pressure levels. The hazard ratio for stage 3 hypertension was 5.34 (95% confidence interval, 2.66-10.71; P<.001) compared with optimal blood pressure after adjustment for other covariates. Among subjects aged 60 to 79 years, the incidences for stages 1 through 3 hypertension were significantly higher than for those with optimal and normal blood pressure. In comparison, among those 80 years or older, the incidence was significantly higher only in patients with stage 3 hypertension. We further estimated the incidences according to the risk stratification system. In the younger elderly subjects, the incidences increased with rising blood pressure levels in each risk stratum. Similar relationships were not observed among the older elderly subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the recommendations of the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure were potentially applicable to the Japanese elderly subjects 79 years or younger. Based on our findings, however, hypertension might not be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease among very old hypertensive patients with advanced atherosclerosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arima et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=588). Stage 3 hypertension vs. Optimal blood pressure was evaluated on Cardiovascular disease (HR 5.34, 95% CI 2.66-10.71, p=<.001). Stage 3 hypertension significantly increased the risk of cardiovascular disease compared with optimal blood pressure in Japanese elderly subjects (HR 5.34; 95% CI 2.66-10.71; P<.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ea9c3a14f152feaf9ad1dhttps://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.3.361
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper