PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 10, 2025Hypertension Research4 citationsOpen Access

Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and dementia risk after considering antihypertensive treatment: real-world data from the Japanese National Health Insurance

MSMichihiro SatohHNHiroki NobayashiSNShingo Nakayama

Key Result

High visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability increased the risk of dementia compared to lower variability in both treated (HR 1.43) and untreated (HR 1.50) participants.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=301,448)

Structured PICO

Does high visit-to-visit blood pressure variability increase the risk of dementia in adults aged >50 years?

P
Population
301,448 adults aged >50 and <75 years from the Japanese National Health Insurance database, mean age 66.6 years, 38.6% male. Excluded: history of cardiovascular disease, prior dementia diagnosis or antidementia drug use, and follow-up <30 days.
I
Intervention
High visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability (highest sextile of coefficient of variation: ≥9.83% for untreated, ≥10.67% for treated) measured across 5 annual health check-ups.
C
Comparator
Lower visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability (1st-5th sextiles of coefficient of variation).
O
Outcome
Antidementia drug initiation as a proxy for dementia diagnosis.hard clinical

High visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is associated with an increased risk of dementia, regardless of antihypertensive treatment status or medication adherence.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 1.43 (95% CI 1.09-1.89)

Limitations

  • Potential healthy user bias due to requiring at least five health examinations within 8 years.
  • Outcome measures relied on antidementia drug initiation, potentially overlooking non-pharmacological interventions.
  • Relatively short follow-up duration may be insufficient to capture the complete trajectory of cognitive decline.
  • Definition of antihypertensive medications encompassed prescriptions for other conditions like heart failure.
  • Unmeasured confounding variables, including educational attainment and socioeconomic status.
  • Healthy user bias due to requiring five health examinations within 8 years
  • Outcome relied on antidementia drug initiation, potentially missing non-pharmacological cases
  • Relatively short follow-up duration

Abstract

Abstract This retrospective cohort study evaluated the association between visit-to-visit blood pressure (BP) variability and dementia risk, considering antihypertensive drug classes and medication adherence using Japanese National Health Insurance data (2015–2023) of 301,448 participants (age: 66.6 years, male: 38.6%). Visit-to-visit systolic BP (SBP) variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) from five annual health check-ups. The outcome was antidementia drug initiation as a proxy for dementia diagnosis and was analyzed using Fine-Gray models, with death as the competing outcome. For participants untreated/treated with antihypertensive medication, 366/298 initiated antidementia drugs during 2.20 ± 1.19/2.11 ± 1.19 years of follow-up, respectively. The highest SBP-CV sextile was associated with dementia risk regardless of treatment status: hazard ratio of the 6 th sextile (SBP-CV ≥ 9.83%) vs. 1 st –5 th sextiles was 1.50 (95% confidence interval CI: 1.17–1.92) for untreated participants, while for treated participants, the hazard ratio of the 6 th sextile (SBP-CV ≥ 10.67%) was 1.43 (95%CI: 1.09–1.89) after further adjusting for antihypertensive drug classes and medication adherence assessed by medication possession rate. In the stratification analyses by baseline characteristics, only HbA1c in treated participants demonstrated a significant interaction with SBP-CV for dementia risk; this association was pronounced among treated participants with HbA1c ≥ 6.5% (interaction P = 0.024). No significant interactions were observed among antihypertensive drugs, poor adherence, and SBP-CV in relation to dementia risk. High visit-to-visit BP variability, indicated by a CV of approximately ≥10%, is associated with dementia, regardless of treatment status. In the treated participants, this association persisted even after accounting for antihypertensive drug classes and medication adherence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Satoh et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Dementia (n=301,448). High visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability (highest sextile) vs. Lower visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability (1st-5th sextiles) was evaluated on Antidementia drug initiation (proxy for dementia diagnosis) (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.09-1.89). High visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability increased the risk of dementia compared to lower variability in both treated (HR 1.43) and untreated (HR 1.50) participants.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0eb0d0b9cfc04f9247a249https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-025-02451-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper