PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2006Journal of Personality and Social Psychology957 citations

Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample.

View Full Paper
CDColin G. DeYoung

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In a large community sample (N=490), the Big Five were not orthogonal when modeled as latent variables representing the shared variance of reports from 4 different informants. Additionally, the standard higher-order factor structure was present in latent space: Neuroticism (reversed), Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness formed one factor, labeled Stability, and Extraversion and Openness/Intellect formed a second factor, labeled Plasticity. Comparison of two instruments, the Big Five Inventory and the Mini-Markers, supported the hypotheses that single-adjective rating instruments are likely to yield lower interrater agreement than phrase rating instruments and that lower interrater agreement is associated with weaker correlations among the Big Five and a less coherent higher-order factor structure. In conclusion, an interpretation of the higher-order factors is discussed, including possible neurobiological substrates.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Colin G. DeYoung (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0eb7e01c5e2d2319f9c5f1https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper