PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 11, 2003Presidential Studies Quarterly17 citations

American Values or Human Rights? U.S. Foreign Policy and the Fractured Myth of Virtuous Power

View Full Paper
JKJohn Kane

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

American exceptionalism placed American values at the center of foreign policy, fostering belief in the essential union of American virtue and power. Developing a theme of Henry Kissinger’s, this article argues that in Vietnam this union was severed and undermined: America's power was defeated and its virtue assailed. Nixon offered only a pretense of reunion. Carter attempted the real thing by putting universal human rights, not American values, at the heart of foreign policy. His failure was followed by Reagan's denial of sin and reassurance of American values, though the Gulf War of his successor had a deeper impact on the national psyche. Clinton's foreign policy remained subject to the “Vietnam syndrome” and he, despite rhetorical dazzle, developed no new consensus on the disposition of American power. September 11, however, produced a sense of injured innocence in whose defense American power could again be virtuously deployed. The subsequent patriotic surge encouraged George W. Bush to revive American values in foreign policy, with potentially dangerous consequences.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

John Kane (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ecb2206ecbe833447cec0https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0360-4918.2003.00084.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper