PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 12, 2021Clinical Research in Cardiology42 citationsOpen Access

Concomitant tricuspid regurgitation severity and its secondary reduction determine long-term prognosis after transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair

MGMartin GeyerKKKarsten KellerKBK Bachmann

Key Points

  • To evaluate the impact of baseline tricuspid regurgitation severity and its secondary post-procedural reduction on long-term survival after isolated transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair.
  • Retrospective monocentric study analyzing N=606 patients (46.5% female, 56.4% functional mitral regurgitation) undergoing isolated edge-to-edge repair between June 2010 and March 2018.

Structured PICO

Does concomitant tricuspid regurgitation severity and its secondary reduction determine long-term prognosis after transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair?

P
Population
606 patients undergoing isolated transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair, 46.5% female, 56.4% functional MR (FMR).
I
Intervention
Isolated transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair
C
Comparator
Patients with non-severe baseline tricuspid regurgitation, or patients with post-interventional reduction of tricuspid regurgitation severity
O
Outcome
Long-term survivalhard clinical

Severe baseline tricuspid regurgitation and lack of its secondary reduction after transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair are associated with worse long-term survival, particularly in patients with functional mitral regurgitation.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concomitant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common finding in mitral regurgitation (MR). Transcatheter repair (TMVR) is a favorable treatment option in patients at elevated surgical risk. To date, evidence on long-term prognosis and the prognostic impact of TR after TMVR is limited. METHODS: Long-term survival data of patients undergoing isolated edge-to-edge repair from June 2010 to March 2018 (combinations with other forms of TMVR or tricuspid valve therapy excluded) were analyzed in a retrospective monocentric study. TR severity was categorized and the impact of TR on survival was analysed. RESULTS: Overall, 606 patients 46.5% female, 56.4% functional MR (FMR) were enrolled in this study. TR at baseline was categorized severe/medium/mild/no or trace in 23.2/34.3/36.3/6.3% of the cases. At 30-day follow-up, improvement of at least one TR-grade was documented in 34.9%. Severe TR at baseline was identified as predictor of 1-year survival 65.2% vs. 77.0%, p = 0.030; HR for death 1.68 (95% CI 1.12-2.54), p = 0.013 and in FMR-patients also regarding long-term prognosis adjusted HR for long-term mortality 1.57 (95% CI 1.00-2.45), p = 0.049. Missing post-interventional reduction of TR severity was predictive for poor prognosis, especially in the FMR-subgroup 1-year survival: 92.9% vs. 78.3%, p = 0.025; HR for death at 1-year follow-up 3.31 (95% CI 1.15-9.58), p = 0.027. While BNP levels decreased in both subgroups, TR reduction was associated with improved symptomatic benefit (NYHA-class-reduction 78.6 vs. 65.9%, p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: In this large study, both, severe TR at baseline as well as missing secondary reduction were predictive for impaired long-term prognosis, especially in patients with FMR etiology. TR reduction was associated with increased symptomatic benefit.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Geyer et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ecd9faa1655e5fb22d1d6https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01798-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper