Does baseline left atrial diameter predict adverse long-term outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair?
Left atrial enlargement is a strong and independent predictor of adverse long-term outcomes, including 4-year mortality and hospitalization, after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair.
BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) dimension is a marker of disease severity and outcome in primary and secondary mitral regurgitation. In transcatheter mitral valve repair, LA enlargement might additionally impact on device handling and technical success through an altered anatomy and atrial annular dilatation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the multicentre German TRAnscatheter Mitral valve Interventions registry (TRAMI) were used to analyse the association of baseline LA diameter by tertiles with efficacy, safety and long-term clinical outcome in patients undergoing edge-to-edge repair with MitraClip. In 520 of 843 patients prospectively enrolled in TRAMI, baseline LA diameter were reported median (interquartile range) LA diameter in tertiles: 44 (40-46) mm, 51 (48-53) mm and 60 (55-66) mm. Larger LA diameters were significantly associated with secondary aetiology of mitral regurgitation, lower ejection fraction, larger left ventricle, male sex and atrial fibrillation (all P < 0.05). Technical success was not different across tertiles (96%, 95.4% and 98.4%, respectively; P = 0.43) as were major in-hospital cardiovascular and cerebral adverse events (mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke: 1.8%, 1.2% and 4.4%, respectively; P = 0.11 across tertiles). However, 4-year mortality significantly increased with larger LA diameter (32.9%, 46.4% and 51.7%, respectively; P < 0.01), as did hospitalization in survivors (60%, 67.6% and 78.9%, respectively; P < 0.05). The association between LA diameter and outcome remained significant after multivariable adjustment including baseline left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. CONCLUSION: Left atrial enlargement is a strong and independent predictor of adverse long-term outcome after transcatheter mitral valve repair. Further study is warranted to examine whether timely intervention may have the potential to modify outcome.
Iliadis et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: