PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2023Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove Czech Republic)1 citationsOpen Access

Current Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Strategy for General Practitioners in Emergency Department

View Full Paper
JLJoshua Eldad Frederich LasanudinSLSidhi LaksonoHKHillary Kusharsamita

Key Result

Clinical decision rules combined with D-dimer assessment can effectively exclude pulmonary embolism, guiding appropriate risk-stratified management in the emergency department.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients with suspected or confirmed acute pulmonary embolism in the emergency department
I
Intervention
Diagnostic algorithms (PERC, Wells criteria, Revised Geneva criteria, D-dimer, CUS, CTPA, V/Q scan) and risk-stratified management (anticoagulants, reperfusion therapy)

This review provides a structured algorithm for general practitioners in the emergency department to diagnose and manage acute pulmonary embolism based on clinical decision rules, imaging, and risk stratification.

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a disease with a relatively good prognosis when diagnosed and treated properly. This review aims to analyse available data and combine them into algorithms that physicians can use in the emergency department for quick decision-making in diagnosing and treating PE. The available data show that PE can be excluded through highly sensitive clinical decision rules, i.e. Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria (PERC), Wells criteria, and Revised Geneva criteria, combined with D-dimer assessment. In cases where PE could not be excluded through the mentioned strategies, imaging modalities, such as compression ultrasonography (CUS), computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA), and planar ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan, are indicated for a definite diagnosis. Once a diagnosis has been made, treatment of PE depends on its mortality risk as patients are divided into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk cases. High-risk cases are treated for their hemodynamic instability, given parenteral or oral anticoagulant therapy, and are indicated for reperfusion therapy. Intermediate-risk PE is only given parenteral or oral anticoagulants and reperfusion is indicated when anticoagulants fail. Low-risk cases are given oral anticoagulants and based on the Hestia criteria, patients may be discharged and treated as outpatients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lasanudin et al. (2023) conducted a review in Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Diagnostic and management algorithms was evaluated. Clinical decision rules combined with D-dimer assessment can effectively exclude pulmonary embolism, guiding appropriate risk-stratified management in the emergency department.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ecdf41c5e2d2319f9e56bhttps://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2024.8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin with Unfractionated Heparin for Acute Pulmonary Embolism1997 · 785 citations
  2. 2Ruling out pulmonary embolism across different healthcare settings: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis2022 · 47 citations
  3. 3Prognosis in pulmonary embolism2001 · 56 citations
  4. 4State of the art paper Management of massive and nonmassive pulmonary embolism2012 · 70 citations
  5. 5Update on Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Pulmonary Thromboembolism2019 · 52 citations