PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 31, 2009Radiology78 citations

Myocardial Fat Deposition after Left Ventricular Myocardial Infarction: Assessment by Using MR Water-Fat Separation Imaging

View Full Paper
JGJames W. GoldfarbMRMarguerite RothJHJing Han

Key Result

MR fat-water separation imaging demonstrated a 68% prevalence of fat deposition in chronic myocardial infarction, which was associated with larger infarct volume (30.0 vs 14.8 mL; P=0.002).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=25)

Structured PICO

P
Population
25 patients with left ventricular myocardial infarction
I
Intervention
Magnetic resonance (MR) fat-water separation imaging (1.5-T MR system, three-point Dixon reconstruction)
O
Outcome
Prevalence of fat deposition in chronic myocardial infarctionsurrogate

Fat deposition is highly prevalent in healed myocardial infarction and correlates with larger infarct volume and worse regional wall motion.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the prevalence of fat deposition in chronic myocardial infarction (MI) by using magnetic resonance (MR) fat-water separation imaging with sampling of the entire left ventricular (LV) myocardium. A subsidiary aim was to determine the relationship between LV fat deposition and scar characteristics, as well as regional and global cardiac functional parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with LV MI were evaluated in this prospective institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study after they provided written informed consent. A 1.5-T MR system was used to perform volumetric cine, fat-sensitive, and late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) infarct imaging. Water-fat separation was performed by using a three-point Dixon reconstruction from in- and opposed-phase black-blood gradient-echo images. Fat deposition location was compared with LGE infarct imaging by using a 17-segment model. Global and regional functional variables, LGE volumes, and fat deposition were compared by using the Pearson correlation, Student t test, and multiple regression. RESULTS: A fat deposition prevalence of 68% was found in areas of chronic MI. The patients with fat deposition had larger infarctions (30.0 mL +/- 15.1 standard deviation vs 14.8 mL +/- 6.1; P = .002), decreased wall thickening (2.3% +/- 20.0 vs 37.8% +/- 34.4; P = .003), and impaired endocardial wall motion (2.9 mm +/- 2.0 vs 5.8 mm +/- 2.6; P = .007). The volume of fat deposition was correlated with infarct volume, LV ejection fraction, LV end-diastolic volume index, and LV end-systolic volume index. CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of fat deposition in healed MI. It is associated with post-infarction characteristics including infarct volume, LV mass, wall thickness, wall thickening, and wall motion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Goldfarb et al. (2009) conducted an observational in chronic myocardial infarction (n=25). MR fat-water separation imaging was evaluated on Prevalence of fat deposition in chronic myocardial infarction. MR fat-water separation imaging demonstrated a 68% prevalence of fat deposition in chronic myocardial infarction, which was associated with larger infarct volume (30.0 vs 14.8 mL; P=0.002).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ece3a8a6cf20890229b4bhttps://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2532082290
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper