PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2023Cosmoderma5 citationsOpen Access

Peer review in scientific publishing: Current practice, guidelines, relevancy, and way forward

SMShaikat MondalAJAyesha JuhiAKAnita Kumari

Key Points

  • This review evaluates the current peer review process in scientific publishing and offers guidelines for improvement.
  • Comprehensive literature review of peer review practices
  • Assessment of training availability for early career researchers
  • Development of practical guidelines for conducting peer review.
  • Identified gaps in training for early career researchers in peer review processes.
  • Provided a set of practical guidelines for enhancing peer review skills.
  • Highlighted the crucial role of peer review in advancing scientific knowledge.

Abstract

Peer review is the cornerstone of scientific publication. After submission of a research paper, the editors rely on the reviewers’ report for making a decision assuming the expertise of peers in the field of research. Many early career researchers or academicians do not have adequate exposure to peer review process and institutions rarely provide training for developing peer review skills. With this context, this review paper examines the current state of peer review in scientific publishing and provides a practical guideline for conducting peer review. In addition, this article provides a comprehensive resource for scholars and researchers, highlighting the importance of peer review, and offering insights into how it can be optimized for maximum impact on scientific progress.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mondal et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ecf63a14f152feaf9defehttps://doi.org/10.25259/csdm_35_2023
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper