PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 12, 2023Computer Science Education16 citations

The applications of machine learning in computational thinking assessments: a scoping review

View Full Paper
BTBin TanHJHao-Yue JinMCMaria Cutumisu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground and Context Computational thinking (CT) has been increasingly added to K-12 curricula, prompting teachers to grade more and more CT artifacts. This has led to a rise in automated CT assessment tools.Objective This study examines the scope and characteristics of publications that use machine learning (ML) approaches to assess students' CT competencies from four perspectives: the educational context in which the assessments were implemented, the data used to train and validate ML algorithms, the specific ML algorithms used, and the aspects of CT assessed.Method The PRISMA approach and Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for scoping reviews were adopted to search and screen studies.Findings ML algorithms have been increasingly used to assess CT competencies. However, this study identified several research gaps in the literature: existing studies were mostly conducted in the context of programming or other learning activities related to computing science; datasets used by the ML algorithms were generally small; the most frequently used algorithms were regression techniques, naive Bayes, neural networks, clustering, and natural language processing, whereas no studies used reinforcement learning; and CT competencies were not comprehensively assessed.Implications The applications of ML in CT assessments have the potential to enable personalized learning, improve assessment validity, reduce the workload of graders, and gain insights from large datasets by uncovering complex and subtle patterns.KEYWORDS: Machine learningcomputational thinkingassessmentautomatic assessment Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tan et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ed2492eca052da647d112https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2245687
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An AI-Based System for Formative and Summative Assessment in Data Science Courses2020 · 101 citations
  2. 2An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification2003 · 1,143 citations
  3. 3Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers1959 · 4,423 citations
  4. 4A Data-Driven Approach to Automatically Assessing Concept-Level CS Competencies Based on Student Programs.2020 · 4 citations
  5. 5A Methodology for the Analysis of Block-Based Programming Languages Appropriate for Children2019 · 37 citations