PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1986Journal of Applied Physiology152 citations

Enhanced maximal metabolic vasodilatation in the dominant forearms of tennis players

View Full Paper
LSLawrence I. SinowayTMTimothy I. MuschJMJohn R. Minotti

Structured PICO

Does localized exercise training (tennis playing) improve maximal metabolic vasodilation in the dominant forearm compared to the nondominant forearm?

P
Population
6 tennis players and 6 control subjects (n=12)
I
Intervention
Dominant forearm (subjected to localized exercise training from tennis)
C
Comparator
Nondominant forearm (within-subject) and forearms of control subjects
O
Outcome
Maximal metabolic vasodilation (peak forearm blood flow measured after release of arterial occlusion, reactive hyperemic blood flow [RHBF])surrogate

Tennis players exhibit enhanced maximal metabolic vasodilation in their dominant forearms, suggesting a primary peripheral cardiovascular adaptation to localized exercise training.

Abstract

In an effort to evaluate potential peripheral adaptations to training, maximal metabolic vasodilation was studied in the dominant and nondominant forearms of six tennis players and six control subjects. Maximal metabolic vasodilation was defined as the peak forearm blood flow measured after release of arterial occlusion, the reactive hyperemic blood flow (RHBF). Two ischemic stimuli were employed in each subject: 5 min of arterial occlusion (RHBF5) and 5 min of arterial occlusion coupled with 1 min of ischemic exercise (RHBF5ex). RHBF and resting forearm blood flows were measured using venous occlusion strain-gauge plethysmography (ml X min-1 X 100 ml-1). Resting forearm blood flows were similar in both arms of both groups. RHBF5ex was similar in both arms of our control group (dominant, 40.8 +/- 1.2 vs. nondominant, 40.9 +/- 2.1). However, RHBF5ex was 42% higher in the dominant than in the nondominant forearms of our tennis player population (dominant, 48.7 +/- 4.0 vs. nondominant, 34.4 +/- 3.4; P less than 0.05). This intraindividual difference in peak forearm blood flows was not secondary to improved systemic conditioning since the maximal O2 consumptions in the two study groups were similar (controls, 45.4 +/- 3.9 vs. tennis players, 46.1 +/- 1.7). These findings suggest a primary peripheral cardiovascular adaptation to exercise training in the dominant forearms of the tennis players resulting in a greater maximal vasodilatation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sinoway et al. (1986) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ee0d906ecbe833447ea00https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1986.61.2.673
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper