PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 26, 2011Circulation97 citations

Mobile Thrombus on Device Leads in Patients Undergoing Ablation

View Full Paper
GSGregory E. SuppleJRJian‐Fang RenEZErica S. Zado

Key Result

Intracardiac echocardiography detected mobile thrombi on device leads in 30% of ablation patients, associated with higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03-1.20; P=0.01).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=86)

Structured PICO

Does intracardiac echocardiography improve the detection of mobile thrombi on device leads compared to transthoracic echocardiography in patients undergoing ablation?

P
Population
86 patients with a cardiovascular implantable electronic device presenting for ablation, 84% with congestive heart failure, average LVEF 40%.
I
Intervention
Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)
C
Comparator
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
O
Outcome
Presence of mobile thrombi on device leadssurrogate

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 1.11 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.20)

Absolute Event Rate: 39% vs 33%

p-value: p=0.01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile thrombi, not routinely recognized on transthoracic echocardiography, are frequently identified on cardiovascular implantable electronic device leads with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) during ablation procedures. Their incidence, characteristics, and consequences have not yet been defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used ICE to examine leads for thrombi and to measure the pulmonary artery systolic pressure in patients with a cardiovascular implantable electronic device presenting for ablation. Patient clinical characteristics, device type, and lead characteristics were correlated with presence of thrombi. Most patients had congestive heart failure (84%), with an average left ventricular ejection fraction of 40%. Thrombi were seen with ICE in 26 of 86 patients (30%) but were seen on transthoracic echocardiography in only 1 of the 26 patients. Thrombi on ICE were mobile, averaged 18 ± 5.9 mm long by 4.4 ± 2.3 mm wide, and were more commonly identified in the right atrium (n=25) than in the right ventricle (n=5). Thrombi were associated with higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure: 39 ± 9 mm Hg with thrombi versus 33 ± 7 mm Hg without thrombi (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.20; P=0.01). No other characteristic assessed was associated with a significant difference in the presence of lead thrombi. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile thrombi on cardiovascular implantable electronic device leads are present in 30% of patients undergoing ablation and are readily identified with ICE despite being underrecognized with transthoracic echocardiography. Further study is warranted to determine whether lead thrombi are a clinically relevant source of pulmonary emboli in some patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Supple et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular implantable electronic device presenting for ablation (n=86). Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) vs. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was evaluated on Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (mm Hg) in patients with versus without thrombi (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.20, p=0.01). Intracardiac echocardiography detected mobile thrombi on device leads in 30% of ablation patients, associated with higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03-1.20; P=0.01).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ee30337aeb0126447b4c6https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.028647
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper