PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 15, 1957Physical Review717 citations

Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky

View Full Paper
DBDavid BöhmYAYakir Aharonov

Key Points

  • Evaluate the physical significance of the Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky (EPR) paradox and determine whether existing experimental data can definitively refute classical alternative resolutions.
  • Analyzed the theoretical framework governing correlations between distant, noninteracting physical systems.
  • Formulated an alternative hypothesis designed to circumvent the EPR paradox while maintaining consistency with previously analyzed experimental data.
  • Re-evaluated existing experimental evidence to test the validity of proposed classical resolutions to the paradox.
  • Demonstrated that the proposed alternative hypothesis to avoid the paradox is untestable and directly contradicted by existing experimental data.
  • Established that a wide class of classical resolutions attempting to explain away distant quantum correlations is untenable.
  • Provided empirical confirmation that the non-local correlations predicted by quantum theory reflect real physical properties of matter.

Abstract

A brief review of the physical significance of the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky is given, and it is shown that it involves a kind of correlation of the properties of distant noninteracting systems, which is quite different from previously known kinds of correlation. An illustrative hypothesis is considered, which would avoid the paradox, and which would still be consistent with all experimental results that have been analyzed to date. It is shown, however, that there already is an experiment whose significance with regard to this problem has not yet been explicitly brought out, but which is able to prove that this suggested resolution of the paradox (as well as a very wide class of such resolutions) is not tenable. Thus, this experiment may be regarded as the first clear empirical proof that the aspects of the quantum theory discussed by Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky represent real properties of matter.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Böhm et al. (1957) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ee682a14f152feaf9fed9https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.108.1070
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper