A nurse-led transitional care intervention significantly improved disease-specific quality of life (MLHFQ score 27.2 vs 37.5; P=0.002) and reduced emergency room visits (29% vs 46%; P=0.03).
RCT
randomized
Does a nurse-led transitional care intervention improve health-related quality of life and reduce readmissions and emergency room use in patients with congestive heart failure?
A nurse-led transitional care intervention significantly improves disease-specific quality of life and reduces emergency room visits in patients recently discharged for heart failure.
Absolute Event Rate: 27.2% vs 37.5%
p-value: p=0.002
BACKGROUND: The growing number of patients with congestive heart failure has increased both the pressure on hospital resources and the need for community management of the condition. Improving hospital-to-home transition for this population is a logical step in responding to current practice guidelines' recommendations for coordination and education. Positive outcomes have been reported from trials evaluating multiple interventions, enhanced hospital discharge, and follow-up through the addition of a case management role. The question remains if similar gains could be achieved working with usual hospital and community nurses. METHODS: A 12-week, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted of the effect of transitional care on health-related quality of life (disease-specific and generic measures), rates of readmission, and emergency room use. The nurse-led intervention focused on the transition from hospital-to-home and supportive care for self-management 2 weeks after hospital discharge. RESULTS: At 6 weeks after hospital discharge, the overall Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score was better among the Transitional Care patients (27.2 +/- 19.1 SD) than among the Usual Care patients (37.5 +/- 20.3 SD; P = 0.002). Similar results were found at 12 weeks postdischarge for the overall MLHFQ and at 6- and 12-weeks postdischarge for the MLHFQ's Physical Dimension and Emotional Dimension subscales. Differences in generic quality life, as assessed by the SF-36 Physical component, Mental Component, and General Health subscales, were not significantly different between the Transition and Usual Care groups. At 12 weeks postdischarge, 31% of the Usual Care patients had been readmitted compared with 23% of the Transitional Care patients (P = 0.26), and 46% of the Usual Care group visited the emergency department compared with 29% in the Transitional Care group (chi2 = 4.86, df 1, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQL) associated with Transitional Care and less use of emergency rooms.
Harrison et al. (2002) conducted an RCT in congestive heart failure. Transitional care vs. Usual Care was evaluated on overall Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score at 6 weeks (p=0.002). A nurse-led transitional care intervention significantly improved disease-specific quality of life (MLHFQ score 27.2 vs 37.5; P=0.002) and reduced emergency room visits (29% vs 46%; P=0.03).