PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2021IEEE Access388 citationsOpen Access

Improving the Prediction of Heart Failure Patients’ Survival Using SMOTE and Effective Data Mining Techniques

AIAbid IshaqSSSaima SadiqMUMuhammad Umer

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is a substantial cause of mortality and morbidity in the world. In clinical data analytics, it is a great challenge to predict heart disease survivor. Data mining transforms huge amounts of raw data generated by the health industry into useful information that can help in making informed decisions. Various studies proved that significant features play a key role in improving performance of machine learning models. This study analyzes the heart failure survivors from the dataset of 299 patients admitted in hospital. The aim is to find significant features and effective data mining techniques that can boost the accuracy of cardiovascular patient’s survivor prediction. To predict patient’s survival, this study employs nine classification models: Decision Tree (DT), Adaptive boosting classifier (AdaBoost), Logistic Regression (LR), Stochastic Gradient classifier (SGD), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting classifier (GBM), Extra Tree Classifier (ETC), Gaussian Naive Bayes classifier (G-NB) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The imbalance class problem is handled by Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE). Furthermore, machine learning models are trained on the highest ranked features selected by RF. The results are compared with those provided by machine learning algorithms using full set of features. Experimental results demonstrate that ETC outperforms other models and achieves 0.9262 accuracy value with SMOTE in prediction of heart patient’s survival.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ishaq et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0efdc0b9cfc04f9247b507https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3064084
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score.1987 · 1,976 citations
  2. 2A Hybrid Classification System for Heart Disease Diagnosis Based on the RFRS Method2017 · 188 citations
  3. 3UCI Machine Learning Repository2007 · 24,328 citations
  4. 4Boosting in the presence of noise2004 · 53 citations
  5. 5Diagnosing coronary artery disease via data mining algorithms by considering laboratory and echocardiography features2013 · 73 citations