Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathies: An In-Depth Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications

Background and Objectives: Nonischemic cardiomyopathies comprise a wide spectrum of heart muscle disorders characterized by different morphological, functional, and tissue abnormalities. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) represents the gold standard imaging modality for assessing cardiac morphology, systolic function, and tissue characterization, thereby aiding in early diagnosis, precise phenotyping, and tailored treatment. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date overview of CMR techniques for studying myocardial perfusion and their applications to nonischemic cardiomyopathy, not only to rule out an underlying ischemic aetiology but also to investigate the pathophysiological characteristics of microcirculatory dysfunction in these patients. Materials and Methods: We performed a structured review of the literature focusing on first-pass gadolinium perfusion sequences, stress protocols, and emerging pixel-wise perfusion mapping approaches. Studies were selected to illustrate the methods for image acquisition, post-processing, and quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), as well as to highlight associations with clinical endpoints. Results: First-pass CMR perfusion imaging reliably detects diffuse and regional microvascular dysfunction across cardiomyopathies. Semi-quantitative parameters (e.g., upslope, MPRI) and quantitative MBF mapping (mL/g/min) have demonstrated that impaired perfusion correlates with disease severity, extent of fibrosis, and adverse outcomes, including heart failure hospitalization, arrhythmias, and mortality. Novel automated pixel-wise mapping enhances reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy, distinguishing coronary microvascular dysfunction from balanced three-vessel disease. Microvascular dysfunction—present in approximately 50–60% of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), 40–80% of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and >95% of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) patients—has emerged as a key driver of adverse outcomes. Perfusion defects appear early, often preceding overt hypertrophy or fibrosis, and provide incremental prognostic value beyond conventional CMR metrics. Conclusions: CMR represents a powerful tool for detecting myocardial perfusion abnormalities in nonischemic cardiomyopathies, improving phenotyping, risk stratification, and personalized management. Further standardization of quantitative perfusion techniques will facilitate broader clinical adoption.