PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2001Punishment & Society511 citations

Governing Social Marginality

View Full Paper
KBKatherine BeckettBWBruce Western

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Rapid growth of the US penal population over the last two decades has coincided with a decline in the number of welfare recipients. While shifts in crime rates, economic and political considerations most commonly account for variations in incarceration, we place the rise in incarceration levels in the institutional context of welfare state retrenchment. An analysis of state-level incarceration rates between 1975 and 1995 indicates that large penal systems are found in states with weak welfare systems. The negative relationship between welfare and incarceration grows over time, suggesting the emergence of a novel kind of penal-welfare regime in the late 1980s and 1990s. Although welfare state retrenchment is often interpreted as a kind of market deregulation, our analysis suggests that declining support for social welfare is part of a punitive policy development in which the state has a substantial and active role.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Beckett et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f00ddaa1655e5fb231fb7https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228249
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper