PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1968The Journal of Cell Biology335 citationsOpen Access

Cardiac Muscle

JSJoachim R. SommerEJEdward A. Johnson

Key Points

  • To compare the fine structural morphology of ventricular and Purkinje fibers across multiple mammalian species and evaluate differences in their excitation-contraction coupling structures.
  • Examined cardiac ventricular and Purkinje fibers from guinea pigs, rabbits, cats, dogs, goats, and sheep using light and electron microscopy.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Hearts of guinea pig, rabbit, cat, dog, goat, and sheep
I
Intervention
Light and electron microscopy
C
Comparator
Comparison between ventricular (V) and Purkinje (P) fibers
O
Outcome
Morphological differences, specifically the presence of transverse tubules and sarcoplasmic reticulum couplingssurrogate

This study establishes the fundamental ultrastructural differences between ventricular and Purkinje fibers across multiple mammalian species, highlighting the absence of transverse tubules in Purkinje fibers.

Abstract

With light and electron microscopy a comparison has been made of the morphology of ventricular (V) and Purkinje (P) fibers of the hearts of guinea pig, rabbit, cat, dog, goat, and sheep. The criteria, previously established for the rabbit heart, that V fibers are distinguished from P fibers by the respective presence and absence of transverse tubules is shown to be true for all animals studied. No evidence was found of a permanent connection between the sarcoplasmic reticulum and the extracellular space. The sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) of V fibers formed couplings with the sarcolemma of a transverse tubule (interior coupling) and with the peripheral sarcolemma (peripheral coupling), whereas in P fibers the SR formed only peripheral couplings. The forms of the couplings were identical. The significance, with respect to excitation-contraction coupling, of the difference in the form of the couplings in cardiac versus skeletal muscle is discussed together with the electrophysiological implications of the differing geometries of bundles of P fibers from different animals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sommer et al. (1968) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f0847b7cc3b883f22ff17https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.36.3.497
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper