PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 26, 2017American Journal of Roentgenology309 citations

Implementing Machine Learning in Radiology Practice and Research

View Full Paper
MKMarc KohliLPLuciano M. PrevedelloRFRoss W. Filice

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this article are to describe concepts that radiologists should understand to evaluate machine learning projects, including common algorithms, supervised as opposed to unsupervised techniques, statistical pitfalls, and data considerations for training and evaluation, and to briefly describe ethical dilemmas and legal risk. CONCLUSION: Machine learning includes a broad class of computer programs that improve with experience. The complexity of creating, training, and monitoring machine learning indicates that the success of the algorithms will require radiologist involvement for years to come, leading to engagement rather than replacement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kohli et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f1cf011edbd3546bdb830https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.16.17224
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database2009 · 63,148 citations
  2. 2Progress in Fully Automated Abdominal CT Interpretation2016 · 88 citations
  3. 3Discrimination of Breast Cancer with Microcalcifications on Mammography by Deep Learning2016 · 293 citations
  4. 4Discriminative analysis of schizophrenia using support vector machine and recursive feature elimination on structural MRI images2016 · 102 citations
  5. 5MRI texture features as biomarkers to predict MGMT methylation status in glioblastomas2016 · 165 citations