PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2000Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions386 citations

Stenting of bifurcation lesions: Classification, treatments, and results

View Full Paper
TLThierry Lef�vreYLYves LouvardMMMarie‐Claude Morice

Key Result

Systematic coronary stenting of bifurcation lesions reduced 7-month MACE from 29.2% in an earlier period to 17.1% in a later period (P<0.01), associated with increased tubular stent use.

Key Points

  • To prospectively evaluate the procedural success, complication rates, and long-term clinical outcomes of systematic coronary stenting in bifurcation lesions.
  • Conducted a prospective single-center observational study of 366 consecutive patients (373 bifurcation lesions with a side branch diameter ≥ 2.2 mm) over a 35-month inclusion period.
  • Treated lesions with predefined bifurcation stenting strategies, deploying stents in 96.3% of main branches and 63.2% of side branches (both branches stented in 59.5%).
  • Evaluated 1-month and 7-month clinical outcomes across two sequential timeframes (period I: n=182 vs. period II: n=127) to assess the impact of technique evolution.
  • Procedural success was achieved in 99.4% of main branches and 96.3% of both branches, with a 1-month major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate of 4.8% and a 7-month total event rate of 21.6%.
  • Target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 7 months decreased from 20.6% in period I to 13.8% in period II (P = 0.04), while overall MACE dropped from 29.2% to 17.1% (P < 0.01).
  • Outcome improvements were significantly associated on univariate analysis with increased deployment of tubular stents in the main branch (94.2% vs. 59.1%, P < 0.001) and kissing balloon inflation (75.4% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.001).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=366)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does systematic coronary stenting improve procedural success and reduce adverse events in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions?

P
Population
366 patients with 373 coronary bifurcation lesions involving a side branch ≥ 2.2 mm in diameter, mean age 63.7 ± 11.6 years, 79.2% male, 46.7% with unstable angina, and 8.3% acute MI.
I
Intervention
Systematic coronary stenting in bifurcation lesions (main branch stented in 96.3% of cases, side branch in 63.2%, both branches in 59.5%).
O
Outcome
Procedural success, 1-month major cardiac event rate (MACE: death, emergency CABG, Q-wave MI, acute or subacute closure, repeat PTCA, and non-Q-wave MI), and 7-month MACCE and target vessel revascularization (TVR).composite

Systematic coronary stenting of bifurcation lesions yields high procedural success, and clinical outcomes improve significantly with the use of tubular stents in the main branch and final kissing balloon inflation.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 17.1% vs 29.2%

p-value: p=<0.01

Abstract

Percutaneous transluminal balloon coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of coronary bifurcations is associated with a low success rate, high rate of complications, and high incidence of target vessel revascularization (TVR). The strategy of systematic coronary stenting in bifurcation lesions involving a side branch ≥ 2.2 mm in diameter was prospectively evaluated in a single-center observational study during a 35-month inclusion period. All patients meeting these criteria were consecutively included. Bifurcation lesions and treatment were predefined in the study. The study included 366 patients (12.1% of PTCA) with 373 bifurcation lesions, mean age 63.7 ± 11.6 years, 79.2% male, 46.7% with unstable angina, and 8.3% acute MI. The left anterior descending/diagonal bifurcation was involved in 55.2% of cases, circumflex/marginal 22.2%, PDA/PLA 10.4%, left main bifurcation in 6.8%, and others 5.4%. The main branch (2.78 ± 0.42 mm reference diameter) was stented in 96.3% of cases and the side branch (2.44 ± 0.43 mm) in 63.2% (the two branches were stented in 59.5% of cases). Procedural success was obtained in 96.3% in both branches and 99.4% in the main branch. At1-month follow-up, The major cardiac event rate (MACE) was 4.8% (death 1.1%, emergency CABG 0.6%, Q-wave MI 0.9%, acute or subacute closure 1.4%, repeat PTCA 1.1%, and non-Q–wave MI 2.3%). At 7-month follow-up, the total MACCE rate was 21.6%, including a TVR rate of 17.2%. Analysis of the 7-month outcome according to two study periods (period I, 1 January 1996 to 31 August 1997, 182 patients; period II, 1 September 1997 to 30 June 1998, 127 patients) showed that the TVR rate decreased from 20.6% to 13.8% (P = 0.04) and the MACE rate from 29.2% to 17.1% (P < 0.01) in period I and II, respectively. This was associated by univariate analysis with an increasing use of tubular stents deployed in the main branch (94.2% vs. 59.1%, P < 0.001) and kissing balloon inflation after coronary stenting (75.4% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.001). Bifurcation lesions are frequent. Procedural success of coronary stenting is high with a low rate of in-hospital MACE. TVR rate at follow-up is relatively low. In-hospital and follow-up results are influenced not only by the learning curve but also by the use of tubular stents in the main branch and final kissing balloon inflation. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 49:274–283, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lef�vre et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Coronary bifurcation lesions (n=366). Systematic coronary stenting vs. Earlier study period (Period I) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 7 months (p=<0.01). Systematic coronary stenting of bifurcation lesions reduced 7-month MACE from 29.2% in an earlier period to 17.1% in a later period (P<0.01), associated with increased tubular stent use.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f29331cf410a932426df5https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200003)49:3<274::aid-ccd11>3.0.co;2-n
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper