PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2011Stroke335 citations

Cerebral Infarction After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Contributes to Poor Outcome by Vasospasm-Dependent and -Independent Effects

View Full Paper
MVMervyn D. I. VergouwenDIDon IlodigweRMR. Loch Macdonald

Structured PICO

Does cerebral infarction contribute to poor outcome by vasospasm-independent effects in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage?

P
Population
413 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage included in the Clazosentan to Overcome Neurological Ischemia and Infarction Occurring After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (CONSCIOUS-1) trial
O
Outcome
Incidence of neurological worsening, cerebral infarction, and poor outcomehard clinical

Cerebral infarction after subarachnoid hemorrhage contributes to poor outcome through both vasospasm-dependent and vasospasm-independent mechanisms, suggesting other factors are involved in delayed cerebral ischemia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The pathogenesis of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage remains incompletely understood. It is generally assumed that it is caused by angiographic vasospasm. Our aim was to clarify the relationship among angiographic vasospasm, neurological worsening, cerebral infarction, and poor outcome and to investigate whether cerebral infarction also contributes to poor outcome by vasospasm-independent effects. METHODS: This exploratory analysis used data from 413 patients included in the Clazosentan to Overcome Neurological Ischemia and Infarction Occurring After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (CONSCIOUS-1) trial. We studied the incidence of neurological worsening, cerebral infarction, and poor outcome in patients with and without angiographic vasospasm. Path analysis implemented by structural equation modeling was performed to determine direct and indirect path coefficients. RESULTS: Of the 194 patients with moderate to severe vasospasm, 43% had neurological worsening of any cause, 20% had cerebral infarction, and 46% poor outcome. Path coefficients for direct effects on poor outcome were 0.20 for World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Grade 4 to 5, 0.13 for history of hypertension, 0.19 for angiographic vasospasm, 0.16 for neurological worsening, and 0.11 for new cerebral infarction. Cerebral infarction contributed to poor outcome by vasospasm-dependent and -independent effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the majority of patients with moderate to severe angiographic vasospasm did not have neurological worsening of any cause or cerebral infarction. Besides, cerebral infarction also has a direct effect on outcome independent of angiographic vasospasm. This suggests that other coexisting factors might be involved in the pathogenesis of delayed cerebral ischemia, which should also be an important research target to improve outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vergouwen et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f2dde4045c7e590426e44https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.597914
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper