PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 15, 1935Physical Review1,954 citationsOpen Access

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?

NBNicole L. Bohr

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

It is shown that a certain "criterion of physical reality" formulated in a recent article with the above title by A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen contains an essential ambiguity when it is applied to quantum phenomena. In this connection a viewpoint termed "complementarity" is explained from which quantum-mechanical description of physical phenomena would seem to fulfill, within its scope, all rational demands of completeness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nicole L. Bohr (1935) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f33cff7e1df59726c979dhttps://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.48.696
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?1996 · 476 citations
  2. 2Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature1935 · 383 citations
  3. 3Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?1935 · 16,843 citations