Concomitant application of L-cysteine and nitroglycerin evoked 22% dilation in small coronary microvessels compared to 1% with nitroglycerin alone (p<0.5).
Does the availability of sulfhydryl groups determine the vasodilatory response of small coronary arterioles to nitroglycerin in an open-chest dog model?
The lack of response of small coronary arterioles to nitroglycerin is likely due to a lack of available sulfhydryl groups required for its stereospecific conversion to a vasoactive metabolite.
Absolute Event Rate: 22% vs 1%
p-value: p=<0.5
Nitroglycerin dilates large (greater than or equal to 100 microns) but not small coronary arterial microvessels, and a putative metabolite of nitroglycerin, S-nitroso-L-cysteine, has been shown in vitro to dilate both large and small coronary microvessels. Based on this evidence, we tested the hypothesis that the lack of response of small coronary microvessels was due to an inability of small coronary microvessels to convert nitroglycerin into its vasoactive metabolite and examined possible explanations for this phenomenon. We studied left ventricular epicardial microvessels in vivo using video microscopy and stroboscopic epi-illumination in anesthetized, open-chest dogs. Diameters were determined while the epicardium was suffused with nitroglycerin, S-nitroso-L-cysteine, or S-nitroso-D-cysteine (all 10 microM) and nitroglycerin in the presence of L- or D-cysteine (100 microM). None of the agents affected systemic hemodynamics. Nitroglycerin dilated large arterioles (20 +/- 2%) but not small arterioles (1 +/- 1%). Both S-nitroso-L-cysteine and S-nitroso-D-cysteine were potent dilators of all size classes of microvessels. Concomitant application of L-cysteine and nitroglycerin evoked dilation in small microvessels (22 +/- 4%, p less than 0.5 versus nitroglycerin alone) and larger microvessels (27 +/- 6%, p = NS versus nitroglycerin alone). D-Cysteine did not alter the microvascular response to nitroglycerin in either small (7 +/- 4%, p = NS versus nitroglycerin alone) or large (18 +/- 3%, p = NS versus nitroglycerin alone) microvessels. Neither L-cysteine nor D-cysteine had a direct effect on microvascular diameter. These findings suggest that 1) sulfhydryl groups are required for the conversion of nitroglycerin to its vasoactive metabolite; 2) the interaction between nitroglycerin and sulfhydryl residues is a stereospecific process, indicating either an intracellular mechanism or a membrane-associated enzymatic reaction; and 3) a lack of available sulfhydryl groups may be responsible for the lack of response of small coronary arterioles to nitroglycerin.
Kurz et al. (1991) studied this question. Nitroglycerin with L-cysteine vs. Nitroglycerin alone was evaluated on Dilation of small coronary microvessels (p=<0.5). Concomitant application of L-cysteine and nitroglycerin evoked 22% dilation in small coronary microvessels compared to 1% with nitroglycerin alone (p<0.5).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: