PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2003Annals of Internal Medicine223 citations

Comparison of 10-mg and 5-mg Warfarin Initiation Nomograms Together with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Outpatient Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism

View Full Paper
MKMichael J. KovacsMRMarc RodgerDADavid R. Anderson

Key Result

A 10-mg warfarin initiation nomogram achieved a therapeutic INR 1.4 days earlier than a 5-mg nomogram (P < 0.001), with 83% vs 46% reaching therapeutic INR by day 5.

Key Points

  • To determine whether a 10-mg warfarin initiation nomogram achieves therapeutic anticoagulation more rapidly than a 5-mg nomogram in outpatients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin for acute venous thromboembolism.
  • Randomized controlled trial conducted across outpatient venous thromboembolism services at four tertiary care hospitals.
  • Consecutive patients with acute venous thromboembolism (N=201) received subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin for at least 5 days and were randomly assigned to a 10-mg (n=104) or 5-mg (n=97) initial warfarin dosing nomogram.
  • Patients in the 10-mg group achieved a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) 1.4 days earlier than those in the 5-mg group (P < 0.001).
  • Therapeutic INR was achieved by day 5 in 83% of patients in the 10-mg group versus 46% in the 5-mg group (P < 0.001), with fewer total INR assessments required (8.1 vs. 9.1; P = 0.04).
  • No significant differences were observed between the groups in major bleeding, recurrent venous thromboembolism, survival, or INR values exceeding 5.0.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=201)

Randomization

randomly assigned

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does a 10-mg warfarin initiation nomogram reduce time to therapeutic INR compared to a 5-mg nomogram in outpatients with acute venous thromboembolism?

P
Population
201 outpatients with objectively confirmed diagnoses of acute venous thromboembolism
I
Intervention
10-mg warfarin initiation nomogram, with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin for a minimum of 5 days until therapeutic INR
C
Comparator
5-mg warfarin initiation nomogram, with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin for a minimum of 5 days until therapeutic INR
O
Outcome
Time in days to therapeutic INRsurrogate

A 10-mg warfarin initiation nomogram allows more rapid achievement of a therapeutic INR compared to a 5-mg nomogram without increasing the risk of over-anticoagulation or bleeding.

Main Result

Effect estimate: 1.4 days earlier

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal means of achieving therapeutic oral anticoagulation in the outpatient setting has not been determined. OBJECTIVE: To compare a 10-mg dosing nomogram with a 5-mg nomogram that has been suggested to be sufficient for warfarin initiation. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Outpatient venous thromboembolism services of four tertiary care hospitals. PATIENTS: 201 of 210 consecutive patients with objectively confirmed diagnoses of acute venous thromboembolism. INTERVENTION: All patients were treated with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin for a minimum of 5 days until a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) was achieved. Patients were randomly assigned to initially receive a 10-mg or 5-mg dose of warfarin. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was time in days to therapeutic INR. Secondary end points were the proportion of patients who had achieved a therapeutic INR by day 5, the total number of INR assessments, the number of INR measurements greater than 5.0, incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding, and survival. RESULTS: 210 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 9 were excluded and 201 were randomly assigned to study groups (104 to the 10-mg group and 97 to the 5-mg group). Demographic characteristics of both groups were similar. Patients in the 10-mg group achieved therapeutic INR 1.4 days earlier than patients in the 5-mg group (P < 0.001). Eighty-three percent of patients in the 10-mg group achieved a therapeutic INR by day 5 versus 46% in the 5-mg group (P < 0.001). Fewer INR assessments were performed in the 10-mg group than in the 5-mg group (8.1 vs. 9.1; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the two groups in recurrent events, major bleeding, survival, and number of INR measurements greater than 5.0. CONCLUSION: The 10-mg warfarin initiation nomogram is superior to the 5-mg nomogram because it allows more rapid achievement of a therapeutic INR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kovacs et al. (2003) conducted an RCT in acute venous thromboembolism (n=201). 10-mg warfarin initiation nomogram vs. 5-mg warfarin initiation nomogram was evaluated on time in days to therapeutic INR (1.4 days earlier, p=<0.001). A 10-mg warfarin initiation nomogram achieved a therapeutic INR 1.4 days earlier than a 5-mg nomogram (P < 0.001), with 83% vs 46% reaching therapeutic INR by day 5.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f429e42feb5cfcf9bc5a2https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-9-200305060-00007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper