PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1975Journal of Personality and Social Psychology124 citations

To comply or not comply: Testing the self-perception explanation of the "foot-in-the-door" phenomenon.

View Full Paper
MSMark SnyderMCMichael R. Cunningham

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to test the self-perception explanation of the "foot-in-the-door" phenomenon of increased compliance with a substantial request after prior compliance with a smaller demand. In this study, some subjects were first approached with a small request (answer 8 questions in a telephone survey) the size of which was virtually certain to guarantee compliance. Other subjects were first approached with a request sufficiently large to guarantee noncompliance (answer 50 questions). Subjects in both of these conditions were subsequently approached with a moderately sized request (30 questions sponsored by a different public service organization). As predicted by self-perception theory, subjects in the small-initial-request condition showed a higher rate of compliance to the second request (.519), whereas subjects in the large-initial-request condition showed a lower rate of compliance (.219) than subjects in the no-initial-request control condition (.333).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Snyder et al. (1975) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f6efe9e54838161fcb718https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076245
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Helping and self-attributions: A field experiment.1975 · 89 citations
  2. 2Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique.1966 · 1,623 citations
  3. 3Adaptation-Level Theory1965 · 2,517 citations
  4. 4Effect of the severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behavior.1963 · 291 citations
  5. 5Effects of severity of threat and perceived availability on the attractiveness of objects.1965 · 37 citations