PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2020The History of the Family18 citations

Selective pronatalism in childcare and reproductive health policies in Czechoslovakia

View Full Paper
HHHana HaškováRDRadka Dudová

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The paper discusses how selective pronatalism has been incorporated into childcare and reproductive health policies in the socialist state of Czechoslovakia (1948–1989). It answers the question of how pronatalist framing has been used to categorise ‘others’, whose procreation has been deemed undesirable. It pays attention to the ways limitations on women’s bodily and social citizenship were used as a tool of selective pronatalism, as well as how the pronatalist framing was linked to the framing of women´s interests, to determine whether and how women´s interests were present in the debates on reproduction and childcare. It considers both childcare and reproductive health policies to show how a healthy and able population was to be secured in the socialist state of Czechoslovakia. Based on the framing analysis applied to major policy texts and political discussions preceding legislative changes, the paper analyses the development of abortion policies, policies regulating the use of assisted reproduction technologies, prenatal screening, policies of childcare and family support, and the framings that contributed to their development. By linking the analysis of debates on childcare and reproductive health policies, we argue that although pronatalist framing has been used several times in support of women´s interests, it has always been patriarchal and exclusionary.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hašková et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f89dd92676d5461fccd13https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602x.2020.1737561
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mothers in the Motherland: Stalinist Pronatalism in Its Pan-European Context2000 · 103 citations
  2. 2Children by Choice?2018 · 4 citations
  3. 3Reproduction, Medicine and the Socialist State1987 · 30 citations
  4. 4Pronatalism, Gender Politics, and the Renewal of Family Support in Russia: Toward a Feminist Anthropology of “Maternity Capital”2010 · 163 citations
  5. 5Biopolitics without Borders: An Intersectional Re-reading of the Abortion Debate in (Un)democratic Czechoslovakia (1920-1986)2018 · 3 citations