PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1998Biometrika92 citations

Miscellanea. A stopping rule for the continual reassessment method

View Full Paper
JOJohn O’Quigley

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The continual reassessment method provides a new approach for estimating the maximum tolerated dose in a phase I clinical trial. In this paper we investigate a potential stopping rule for this method. We indicate certain situations in which the finally chosen dose level can be predicted with certainty after having included a number of patients strictly less than the projected sample size. There is therefore a clear gain when the only purpose of the trial is to identify a target dose for future experimentation. When prediction with certainty is not possible, we can still estimate the probability that the current level will be the same as all subsequent recommended levels.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

John O’Quigley (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f9d82fa36b6e053fccaaehttps://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/85.3.741
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Consistency of continual reassessment method under model misspecification1996 · 165 citations
  2. 2Estimating the Probability of Toxicity at the Recommended Dose Following a Phase I Clinical Trial in Cancer1992 · 65 citations
  3. 3Adaptive assignment versus balanced randomization in clinical trials: A decision analysis1995 · 195 citations
  4. 4The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions1967 · 4,762 citations
  5. 5Maximum likelihood recursion and stochastic approximation in sequential designs1986 · 30 citations