PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 2023Heart13 citationsOpen Access

Exercise electrocardiography for pre-test assessment of the likelihood of coronary artery disease

LRLaust Dupont RasmussenSSSamuel Emil SchmidtJKJuhani Knuuti

Key Result

The exercise electrocardiography-weighted clinical likelihood model provided similar discrimination of obstructive coronary artery disease compared to the risk factor-weighted model (AUC 83.1% vs 80.7%, p=0.14) but significantly reclassified more patients to a very-low clinical likelihood group.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=3,691)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does an ExECG-weighted clinical likelihood model improve discrimination and reclassification of obstructive CAD compared to a risk factor-weighted model in patients with suspected CAD?

P
Population
Patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing exercise electrocardiography (ExECG). Includes a Training cohort (n=1,214, mean age 57, 57% male), a CAD Validation cohort (n=408, mean age 55, 53% male), and a Prognosis Validation cohort (n=3,283, mean age 57, 57% male).
I
Intervention
Exercise electrocardiography-weighted clinical likelihood (ExECG-CL) model
C
Comparator
Risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood (RF-CL) model (which does not utilize additional ExECG results)
O
Outcome
Discrimination of obstructive CAD (>50% diameter stenosis on invasive coronary angiography) in the CAD validation cohort, and a composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction and death in the prognosis validation cohortcomposite

Incorporating exercise ECG into a clinical likelihood model improves the reclassification of patients with suspected CAD into a very-low risk category, potentially safely reducing the need for downstream testing.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 83.1% vs 80.7%

p-value: p=0.14

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a tool including exercise electrocardiography (ExECG) for patient-specific clinical likelihood estimation of patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: An ExECG-weighted clinical likelihood (ExECG-CL) model was developed in a training cohort of patients with suspected obstructive CAD undergoing ExECG. Next, the ExECG-CL model was applied in a CAD validation cohort undergoing ExECG and clinically driven invasive coronary angiography and a prognosis validation cohort and compared with the risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood (RF-CL) model for obstructive CAD discrimination and prognostication, respectively.In the CAD validation cohort, obstructive CAD was defined as >50% diameter stenosis on invasive coronary angiography. For prognosis, the endpoint was non-fatal myocardial infarction and death. RESULTS: The training cohort consisted of 1214 patients (mean age 57 years, 57% males). In the CAD (N=408; mean age 55 years, 53% males) and prognosis validation (N=3283; mean age 57 years, 57% males) cohorts, 11.8% patients had obstructive CAD and 4.4% met the endpoint. In the CAD validation cohort, discrimination of obstructive CAD was similar between the ExECG-CL and RF-CL models: area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves 83.1% (95% CIs 77.5% to 88.7%) versus 80.7% (95% CI 74.6% to 86.8%), p=0.14. In the ExECG-CL model, more patients had very low (≤5%) clinical likelihood of obstructive CAD compared with the RF-CL (42.2% vs 36.0%, p<0.01) where obstructive CAD prevalence and event risk remained low. CONCLUSIONS: ExECG incorporated into a clinical likelihood model improves reclassification of patients to a very low clinical likelihood group with very low prevalence of obstructive CAD and favourable prognosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rasmussen et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (n=3,691). Exercise electrocardiography-weighted clinical likelihood (ExECG-CL) model vs. Risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood (RF-CL) model was evaluated on Discrimination of obstructive CAD (>50% diameter stenosis on invasive coronary angiography) measured by AUC (95% CI 77.5-88.7, p=0.14). The exercise electrocardiography-weighted clinical likelihood model provided similar discrimination of obstructive coronary artery disease compared to the risk factor-weighted model (AUC 83.1% vs 80.7%, p=0.14) but significantly reclassified more patients to a very-low clinical likelihood group.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f9da4d03631df9ce9cc6chttps://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2023-322970
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper