PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 19, 2026Pharmaceutical Statistics0 citationsOpen Access

A Knowledge Base of Designs and Statistical Methods for Adaptive Clinical Dose‐Finding Trials

View Full Paper
RKRob KesselsYLYongxi LongRSRené Spijker

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Adaptive clinical dose-finding trials aim to identify an optimal drug dose for use in subsequent phase II and III trials. In adaptive dose-finding trials, dose levels for newly included patients are informed by outcomes of patients that received the drug earlier in the trial. The body of methodological research on adaptive dose-finding trials is extensive, but a clear overview is lacking. The goal of this paper is to provide a knowledge base of designs and statistical methods for adaptive clinical dose-finding trials by means of a literature review. We identified 315 adaptive dose-finding trial methodology articles of which the majority was inspired by oncology. Recent methods focused on identification of an optimal dose considering both toxicity and efficacy endpoints, and addressing challenges related to subgroup-specific dose-finding, dose-finding for combination therapies, and incorporation of delayed outcomes in dose-finding. These developments are driven by the emergence of newer classes of cancer drugs, such as targeted therapies and immunotherapies, and by initiatives like Project Optimus. Most articles focused on model-based designs, like the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM), but recent years have seen a strong increase in model-assisted or interval-based designs, including Toxicity Probability Interval (TPI) and Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) designs and expansions thereof. Considering the increasing availability and large variety of adaptive dose-finding trial designs, it is challenging for researchers to find relevant designs tailored to their needs. Therefore, we provide an interactive map summarizing the classification of our results to facilitate the identification of relevant designs/methods, which we will update regularly.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kessels et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f9dbe92676d5461fce320https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70074
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Is the “3+3” Dose-Escalation Phase I Clinical Trial Design Suitable for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine Development? A Recommendation for Alternative Design2014 · 54 citations
  2. 2Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials2016 · 510 citations
  3. 3Dose Individualization for Phase I Cancer Trials With Broadened Eligibility2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4A model‐assisted design for partially or completely ordered groups2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5Subgroup‐specific dose finding in phase I clinical trials based on time to toxicity allowing adaptive subgroup combination2018 · 27 citations