PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1995Journal of Applied Physiology169 citations

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia in humans: an obligatory role for vagal feedback from the lungs

View Full Paper
BTBasel TahaPSPeggy M. SimonJDJerome A. Dempsey

Key Result

Passive positive pressure ventilation reduced respiratory sinus arrhythmia from 11 +/- 2.2 beats/min during active ventilation to 5.4 +/- 0.8 beats/min in normal subjects.

Key Points

  • This study investigates the role of vagal feedback from the lungs in generating respiratory sinus arrhythmia in humans.
  • Compared RSA in lung-denervated patients with intact hearts to normal controls and other transplant patients at matched tidal volumes and frequencies.
  • Examined RSA responses during voluntary and passive ventilation at normocapnia in normal subjects.
  • In normal and liver transplant subjects, RSA increased significantly with tidal volume and effort, showing normal vagal responses.
  • In heart- and lung-denervated subjects, RSA was only 53% of normal during eupnea and did not respond to tidal volume changes.
  • RSA reduced from 11 beats/min during active to 5.4 beats/min during passive ventilation in normal subjects.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=18)

Structured PICO

Does vagal feedback from the lungs play an obligatory role in generating respiratory sinus arrhythmia in humans?

P
Population
18 subjects including 5 lung-denervated double-lung transplant patients with intact hearts, 6 normal control subjects, 5 heart-denervated patients, and 2 liver transplant patients
I
Intervention
Assessment of respiratory sinus arrhythmia during eupnea, varying tidal volumes, inspiratory effort, and breathing frequencies, as well as during voluntary (active) versus passive positive pressure ventilation
C
Comparator
Normal control subjects and liver transplant patients at matched tidal volumes and breathing frequencies
O
Outcome
Magnitude of respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)surrogate

Vagal feedback from pulmonary stretch receptors is obligatory for generating neurally mediated respiratory sinus arrhythmia in awake humans.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 5.4% vs 11%

Abstract

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) is used as a noninvasive measure of vagal cardiac input, but its causative mechanisms in humans remain undetermined. We compared the RSA of five lung-denervated double-lung transplant patients with intact hearts to six normal (N) control subjects, five heart-denervated patients, and two liver transplant patients at matched tidal volumes (VT's) and breathing frequencies. In N and liver transplant subjects, RSA was significant during eupnea and increased two- to threefold with increasing VT and inspiratory effort. In heart- and lung-denervated subjects, RSA at eupnea was significant but was only 53% of that in N subjects and was not respondent to changing VT, inspiratory effort, or breathing frequency. We also compared the RSA of N subjects during voluntary (active) and passive positive pressure ventilation at normocapnia. RSA was reduced from 11 +/- 2.2 beats/min during active ventilation to 5.4 +/- 0.8 beats/min during PPV. We conclude that vagal feedback from pulmonary stretch receptors is obligatory for the generation of a neurally mediated RSA in awake humans at normal and raised levels of VT and respiratory motor output. In intact humans, we also hypothesize an important effect for nonpulmonary central and/or peripheral modulation of RSA. It is likely that the key mechanisms for neurally mediated RSA in unanesthetized humans are mutually dependent.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Taha et al. (1995) conducted an observational in Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (n=18). Passive positive pressure ventilation vs. Voluntary (active) ventilation was evaluated on Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (beats/min). Passive positive pressure ventilation reduced respiratory sinus arrhythmia from 11 +/- 2.2 beats/min during active ventilation to 5.4 +/- 0.8 beats/min in normal subjects.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f9de7d03631df9ce9cd32https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1995.78.2.638
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper